Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cahn, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Toussaint, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cahn, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Toussaint, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Segmentation of cervical cell images

RL Cahn, RS Poulsen and G Toussaint

A major problem in the automation of cervical cytology screening is the segmentation of cell images. This paper describes various standard segmentation methods plus one which determines a segmentation threshold based on the stability of the perimeter of the cell as the threshold is varied. As well as contour, certain structural information is used to decide upon the threshold which separates cytoplasm from the background. Once the cytoplasm threshold is found, cytoplasm and nucleus are separated by simple clustering into three groups, cytoplasm, folded cytoplasm and nucleus. These techniques have been tested on 1500 cervical cells that belong to one of eight normal classes and five abnormal classes. A minimum Mahalanobis distance classifier was used to compare results. Manually thresholded cells were classified correctly 66.0% of the time for the 13 class problem and 95.2% of the time on the two (normal-abnormal) class problem. The contour tracing technique was 52.9% and 90.0% correct, respectively.

Volume 25, Issue 7, pp. 681-688, 07/01/1977
Copyright © 1977 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1977