Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gasperi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Grigolo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gasperi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Grigolo, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The in vitro conversion of a specific molecular form of glucose 6- phosphate dehydrogenase from Musca domestica L

G Gasperi, A Malacrida, L Cima, L Sacchi and A Grigolo

A nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate dependent glucose 6- phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), belonging to type I of Kamada and Hori's classification, is present on the zymograms of newly emerged males of Musca domestica. It is capable of undergoing tryptic degradation and being thus transformed into a different active enzymatic form, with some of its catalytic properties unchanged, but with different electrophoretic mobility. We show in this paper that this specific G6PD form of gut origin in M. domestica is not a tissue- specific enzyme, but rather a product of hydrolytic degradation by gut proteinases which act during the process of homogenization. Besides, the G6PD of type I in the housefly is shown to be sensitive to the "storage effect" and to protection by mercaptoethanol, contrary to its hydrolytic gut form which is not sensitive to these processes. In this connection, we discuss the possible reasons for these differences in behavior.

Volume 26, Issue 10, pp. 850-854, 10/01/1978
Copyright © 1978 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1978