Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ii, K.
Right arrow Articles by Katunuma, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ii, K.
Right arrow Articles by Katunuma, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Different immunolocalizations of cathepsins B, H, and L in the liver

K Ii, K Hizawa, E Kominami, Y Bando and N Katunuma

Different localizations of cathepsin B, H, and L in normal rat liver were revealed immunohistochemically with anticathepsin Fab'-horseradish peroxidase conjugates. Staining of cathepsin B was strong in the periportal sinusoids, possibly in Kupffer cells; and weaker in panlobular hepatocytes. Staining of cathepsin H was strong in panlobular hepatocytes, especially in the periphery of the cytoplasm, possibly representing the peribiliary dense bodies; and weaker in periportal sinusoidal cells, possibly Kupffer cells. Staining of cathepsin L was strongest in centrilobular hepatocytes and weaker in periportal sinusoidal cells, possibly Kupffer cells. These findings, revealed for the first time in the present study, show that the histologic and intracellular localizations of the three cathepsins are different, suggesting that they have different roles in degradation of exogenous and endogenous proteins.

Volume 33, Issue 11, pp. 1173-1175, 11/01/1985
Copyright © 1985 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
S. Waguri, M. Kohmura, S. Kanamori, T. Watanabe, Y. Ohsawa, M. Koike, Y. Tomiyama, M. Wakasugi, E. Kominami, and Y. Uchiyama
Different Distribution Patterns of the Two Mannose 6-phosphate Receptors in Rat Liver
J. Histochem. Cytochem., November 1, 2001; 49(11): 1397 - 1406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1985