Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veltel, D.
Right arrow Articles by Robenek, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veltel, D.
Right arrow Articles by Robenek, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Immunogold surface replica study on the distribution of acetylcholine receptors in cultured rat myotubes

D Veltel and H Robenek

Cell Biology Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Munster, FRG.

We studied the distribution of acetylcholine receptors (AchRs) in rat skeletal muscles, Torpedo membrane fractions, and cultured rat skeletal myotubes. AchRs were first exposed to alpha-bungarotoxin (alpha-BTX) followed by anti-alpha-BTX antibodies. Bound antibodies were visualized with FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies for light microscopy or with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or gold-labeled protein A for electron microscopy. The protocol developed for the present studies detected AchRs with high specificity. In addition, we combined post-fixation immunogold cytochemical and surface replication techniques to study the distribution of AchRs on the dorsal surface of cultured myotubes in detail. Two distinct distribution patterns of AchRs on the cell surfaces of the myotubes were revealed; AchRs were either diffusely distributed or clustered. Dispersed AchRs usually surrounded clusters of AchRs. The AchRs in the clusters were characteristically arranged, and small aggregates of AchRs could also be observed within the clusters. The techniques used in this study are appropriate for studying the dynamics of AchR clustering.

Volume 36, Issue 10, pp. 1295-1303, 10/01/1988
Copyright © 1988 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1988