Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bendayan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Garzon, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bendayan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Garzon, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Protein G-gold complex: comparative evaluation with protein A-gold for high-resolution immunocytochemistry

M Bendayan and S Garzon

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

We combined the protein G-gold complex with several polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for localization of various antigenic sites. The labelings were compared with those obtained using the protein A-gold complex. The results from either the immunodot experiment or immunoelectron microscopy have demonstrated that, for rabbit and guinea pig antibodies, both protein G-gold and protein A-gold complexes label several different specific antibodies with similar efficiency. However, with antibodies raised in goats or in mice, and particularly with mouse monoclonal antibodies, protein G-gold yielded intense and specific labeling, whereas protein A-gold yielded intense and specific labeling, whereas protein A-gold was very variable; it either gave weaker signals or failed to reveal any specific site or, as with one monoclonal, both protein G and protein A gave similar results. The higher affinity and versatility of protein G over protein A, established by the immunochemical approach, was confirmed by immunocytochemistry. Because of its enhanced reactivity with monoclonal antibodies and its broader affinity for polyclonal antibodies, protein G-gold complex appears to be a better and more versatile probe for high-resolution immunocytochemistry.

Volume 36, Issue 6, pp. 597-607, 06/01/1988
Copyright © 1988 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1988