Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Labrecque, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Labrecque, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

In vitro bromodeoxyuridine labeling of nuclei: application to myotube hybridization

C Labrecque, J Huard, G Dansereau, N Albert and JP Tremblay

Laboratoire de Neurobiologie, Universite Laval, Quebec, Canada.

Rat myoblast nuclei were labeled with various concentrations of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), an analogue of thymidine, for 24 or 48 hr. Almost every myoblast was labeled with BrdU at concentrations between 10(-7) M and 10(-5) M. When the cells were labeled with 0.5 microM or more, the percentage of labeled cells remained over 90% and 80% at 2 and 5 days, respectively. However, when the cells were labeled with BrdU concentration lower than 10(-7) M the percentage of labeled nuclei decreased more rapidly with time. The BrdU-labeled cells were mixed with an unlabeled population to determine whether their capacity to fuse was reduced. At a BrdU concentration of 0.5 x 10(-6) M, labeled myoblasts fused to a similar extent as unlabeled myoblasts, and a high percentage of marked cells were still perceptively labeled after 5 days. In contrast, the fusion capacity of myoblasts incubated with more than 10(-6) M BrdU was inhibited after only few rounds of DNA synthesis. These myoblasts were eventually able to fuse, however, when the BrdU diminished in the DNA due to cell division. These results indicate that labeling with BrdU at a concentration of 0.5 x 10(-6) M and an incorporation time of 48 hr is optimal to obtain perceptible immunocytochemical staining without affecting myoblast fusion. Such BrdU immunolabeling could be used as a nuclear marker for hybridization studies.

Volume 39, Issue 10, pp. 1421-1426, 10/01/1991
Copyright © 1991 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1991