Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egger, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bienz, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egger, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bienz, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Light and electron microscopic in situ hybridization: non-radioactive labeling and detection, double hybridization, and combined hybridization-immunocytochemistry

D Egger, M Troxler and K Bienz

Institute for Medical Microbiology, University of Basel, Switzerland.

We performed light and electron microscopic in situ hybridization, according to the same protocol and without pretreatment of sections, on Lowicryl- and LR Gold-embedded cells. Digoxigenin (DIG)- or biotin- labeled riboprobes were visualized by direct or indirect immunodetection using commercially available gold-antibody conjugates with 0.8-10-nm gold grains. At the ultrastructural level, the main findings were that DIG-labeled probes gave a slightly higher labeling intensity (grains per signal) than biotin. The direct detection method produced a more compact signal, which led to better resolution at medium and high magnifications. Labeling intensities of all gold grain sizes were essentially equal. Grain sizes of 5 nm and larger were highly preferable because available enhancement methods are unsatisfactory for ultrasmall grains. The optimized immunodetection protocols are suitable for double hybridization with two different probes and for combined hybridization and immunocytochemistry.

Volume 42, Issue 6, pp. 815-822, 06/01/1994
Copyright © 1994 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
R. Y. Osamura, Y. Itoh, and A. Matsuno
Applications of Plastic Embedding to Electron Microscopic Immunocytochemistry and In Situ Hybridization in Observations of Production and Secretion of Peptide Hormones
J. Histochem. Cytochem., July 1, 2000; 48(7): 885 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
F. Bussière, J. Lehoux, D. A. Thompson, L. J. Skrzeczkowski, and J.-P. Perreault
Subcellular Localization and Rolling Circle Replication of Peach Latent Mosaic Viroid: Hallmarks of Group A Viroids
J. Virol., August 1, 1999; 73(8): 6353 - 6360.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
E.-L. Punnonen, C. Fages, J. Wartiovaara, and H. Rauvala
Ultrastructural Localization of ß-Actin and Amphoterin mRNA in Cultured Cells: Application of Tyramide Signal Amplification and Comparison of Detection Methods
J. Histochem. Cytochem., January 1, 1999; 47(1): 99 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1994