Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huitfeldt, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarze, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huitfeldt, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarze, P. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Differential distribution of Met and epidermal growth factor receptor in normal and carcinogen-treated rat liver

HS Huitfeldt, E Skarpen, B Lindeman, R Becher, EV Thrane and PE Schwarze

Laboratory for Toxicopathology, Institute of Pathology, The National Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are strong hepatocyte mitogens and important regulators of liver regeneration. The TGF-alpha receptor EGFr appears primarily to mediate a proliferative signal, whereas mitogenic, motogenic, and morphogenic effects have been attributed to activation of the HGF receptor Met. We have studied the localization of Met and EGFr in normal and carcinogen-treated rat livers. Oval cells and preneoplastic lesions were induced by diethylnitrosamine initiation, followed by promotion with 2-acetylaminofluorene combined with a partial hepatectomy. Different liver cell populations and their receptor expression were characterized by two-color immunofluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Hepatocytes were detected by keratin K8 staining, and oval cells and bile ducts were recognized by keratin K19 expression. Enzyme-altered preneoplastic lesions ere identified by expression of placental glutathione S-transferase (GST- pi). Staining for these cellular markers was combined with immunodetection of EGFr and Met. Normal liver exhibited strong staining for EGFr in hepatocytes, whereas blood vessels, bile ducts, and some sinusoidal cells were Met-positive. In carcinogen-treated livers, oval cells showed Met but not EGFr immunostaining. GST-pi-positive foci displayed EGFr immunostaining at a similar intensity as surrounding hepatocytes, whereas Met was not detected. Our data indicate that putative liver cells (oval cells) have a growth receptor phenotype similar to that of bile ducts, whereas preneoplastic live lesions appear hepatocyte-like. These results indicate that the preferential proliferation of preneoplastic liver lesions compared to surrounding hepatocytes is not associated with an altered EGFr or Met phenotype.

Volume 44, Issue 3, pp. 227-233, 03/01/1996
Copyright © 1996 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
M. P. Oksvold, E. Skarpen, J. Widerberg, and H. S. Huitfeldt
Fluorescent Histochemical Techniques for Analysis of Intracellular Signaling
J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2002; 50(3): 289 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1996