Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martinez-Menarguez, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ballesta, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martinez-Menarguez, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ballesta, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Evidence for a nonlysosomal origin of the acrosome

JA Martinez-Menarguez, HJ Geuze and J Ballesta

Department of Cell Biology, Center for Electronmicroscopy, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

We studied the biogenesis of the acrosome in sperm cells in immunogold- labeled ultrathin cryosections of rat testis, using a variety of antibodies against endosomal/lysosomal marker protein and acrosin, the major secretory protein of sperm cells. As expected, acrosomes and proacrosomal vesicles in the trans-Golgi region contained abundant acrosin. Rat lysosomal membrane glycoprotein (lgp) 120 and mouse lysosome-associated membrane protein-1 were not detectable in the acrosomal membrane. Similarly, the late endosomal markers cation- dependent and -independent mannose 6-phosphate receptors were absent from the acrosome and proacrosomal vesicles. Therefore, acrosomes do not exhibit these endosomal/lysosomal features. Apart from (pro) acrosomal vesicles, both spermatocytes and spermatids contained classical lysosomes (positive for rat lgp 120, mouse lysosome- associated membrane protein-1, and cathepsin D) that were negative for acrosin. Quantitative analysis of the immunogold labeling showed that spermatocytes express more mannose 6-phosphate receptors and lgp 120 than spermatids, whereas the opposite situation existed for acrosin. These data indicate differential synthetic activity of lysosomal and acrosomal constituents in different states of sperm differentiation. Together, our observations argue against a lysosomal /endosomal origin of the acrosome.

Volume 44, Issue 4, pp. 313-320, 04/01/1996
Copyright © 1996 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Morokuma, N. Nakamura, A. Kato, M. Notoya, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Sakai, H. Fukuda, S. Yamashina, Y. Hirata, and S. Hirose
MARCH-XI, a Novel Transmembrane Ubiquitin Ligase Implicated in Ubiquitin-dependent Protein Sorting in Developing Spermatids
J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2007; 282(34): 24806 - 24815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
P. Redecker, M. R. Kreutz, J. Bockmann, E. D. Gundelfinger, and T. M. Boeckers
Brain Synaptic Junctional Proteins at the Acrosome of Rat Testicular Germ Cells
J. Histochem. Cytochem., June 1, 2003; 51(6): 809 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Ramalho-Santos, G. Schatten, and R. D. Moreno
Control of Membrane Fusion During Spermiogenesis and the Acrosome Reaction
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2002; 67(4): 1043 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1996