Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorimier, P.
Right arrow Articles by Brambilla, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorimier, P.
Right arrow Articles by Brambilla, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Comparison of 35S and chemiluminescence for HPV in situ hybridization in carcinoma cell lines and on human cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

P Lorimier, L Lamarcq, A Negoescu, C Robert, F Labat-Moleur, F Gras-Chappuis, I Durrant and E Brambilla

Laboratoire de Pathologie Cellulaire, CHUR, Grenoble, France.

For in situ hybridization (ISH), development of sensitive, nontoxic alternatives to the use of radioactivity is a constant concern. In this trend, and close to chromogenes and fluorophores, chemiluminescence appears an attractive method. A first positive experience in immunocytochemistry and in ISH, by using the enhanced luminol as luminogene substrate for horseradish peroxidase (HRP) led us to compare the sensitivity of 35S autoradiography and chemiluminescence. For this purpose, we used three human carcinoma cell lines, CaSki [400-600 copies of human papilloma virus (HPV) 16], HeLa (10-50 copies of HPV 18), and SiHa (1-5 copies of HPV 16), and 40 biopsy specimens of human cervical preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions. We performed ISH by using HPV cDNA biotin-labeled probes, detected by a two-step immunocytochemical reaction, the secondary antibodies being either 35S- labeled for autoradiography or HRP-labeled for chemiluminescence. An intensified CCD camera allowed acquisition of the luminescent signal. After only 10 min of photon accumulation, on cell line smears as well as on serial tissue sections, chemiluminescence gave comparable results to those obtained by a 3-week exposure for 35S autoradiography. A quantitative approach on cervical biopsy specimens confirmed this similar level of sensitivity by measuring the area of 35S- or chemiluminescence-stained nuclei. Our results indicate that chemiluminescence is a credible and perfectible alternative to radioisotopes for in situ detection of nucleic acids by hybridization.

Volume 44, Issue 7, pp. 665-671, 07/01/1996
Copyright © 1996 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. Musiani, P. Pasini, M. Zerbini, G. Gentilomi, A. Roda, G. Gallinella, E. Manaresi, and S. Venturoli
Prenatal Diagnosis of Parvovirus B19-Induced Hydrops Fetalis by Chemiluminescence In Situ Hybridization
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 1999; 37(7): 2326 - 2329.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1996