Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vizi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gulya, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vizi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gulya, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, Vol. 48, 893-904, July 2000, Copyright © 2000, The Histochemical Society, Inc.


ARTICLE

Calculation of Maximal Hybridization Capacity (Hmax) for Quantitative In Situ Hybridization: A Case Study for Multiple Calmodulin mRNAs

Sandor Vizia and Karoly Gulyaa
a Department of Zoology and Cell Biology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary

Correspondence to: Karoly Gulya, Dept. of Zoology and Cell Biology, University of Szeged, 2 Egyetem St., POB 659, Szeged H-6722, Hungary. E-mail: gulyak@bio.u-szeged.hu

In estimations of mRNA copy numbers, quantitative in situ hybridization (ISH) is expected to be performed at saturating probe concentration. In practice, however, this condition can rarely be fulfilled when medium to high amounts of transcripts exist and/or in large-scale experiments. To resolve this problem, we developed and tested a double-step procedure involving the use of calmodulin (CaM) I, II, and III [35S]-cRNA probes on adult rat brain sections; the hybridization signals were detected with a phosphorimager. By means of hybridization at increasing probe concentrations for a time sufficient for saturation, saturation curves were created for and maximal hybridization capacity (Hmax) values were assigned to selected brain areas. The Kd values of these various brain areas did not differ significantly, which allowed the creation and use of one calibration graph of Hmax vs hybridized [35S]-cRNA values for all brain areas for a given probe concentration. Large-scale ISH experiments involving a subsaturating probe concentration were performed to estimate Hmax values for multiple CaM mRNAs. A calibration graph corresponding to this probe concentration was created and Hmax values (expressed in ISH copy no/mm2 units) were calculated for several brain regions via the calibration. The value of the method was demonstrated by simultaneous quantification of the total accessible multiple CaM mRNA contents of several brain areas in a precise and economical way. (J Histochem Cytochem 48:893–904, 2000)

Key Words: rat brain, gene expression, calmodulin mRNAs, quantitative in situ hybridization, phosphorimager, image analysis, Hmax


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
E. Hrabovszky and S. L. Petersen
Increased Concentrations of Radioisotopically-labeled Complementary Ribonucleic Acid Probe, Dextran Sulfate, and Dithiothreitol in the Hybridization Buffer Can Improve Results of In Situ Hybridization Histochemistry
J. Histochem. Cytochem., October 1, 2002; 50(10): 1389 - 1400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 2000