Search:        >> Advanced Search
Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Landry, M. Articles by Calas, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Landry, M. Articles by Calas, A. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Immunogold Detection of Co-localized Neuropeptides : Methodological Aspects

Marc Landry, Evelyne Vila–Porcile and André Calas

INSERM E 0358, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux, Institut François Magendie, Bordeaux, France (ML), and Laboratoire de Neurobiologie des Signaux Intercellulaires, UMR CNRS 7101, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Paris, France (EV–P,AC)

Correspondence to: Marc Landry, INSERM E 0358, Institut François Magendie, 1, rue Camille Saint-Saëns, 33 077 Bordeaux Cedex, France. E-mail: marc.landry{at}u-bordeaux2.fr

Whatever the protocol used, electron microscopic immunogold detection still suffers from a lack of sensitivity. In rat supraoptico–posthypophyseal neurons, unlabeled secretory granules are always detectable after electron microscopic immunocytochemistry, and their real status remains questionable. To improve the sensitivity of this approach, we assessed a protocol to visualize either one or the other of co-localized neuropeptides, i.e., vasopressin or galanin, after two successive rounds of immunogold with the same primary antibody performed on both faces of the grid. The use of different-sized gold particles enabled us to visualize the respective contribution of each face of the section to the final labeling. Our results showed a moderate but significant increase in both the proportion of labeled granules and the labeling intensity. Although limited, this improvement of immunogold detection strengthens the relevance of quantitative studies at the electron microscopic level, likely to reveal fine variations of the neuron peptidergic content. However, this enhancement depended on the peptide studied. The present data confirmed a progressive decrease of vasopressin immunoreactivity, already suggested by the single-staining procedure, all along the hypothalamo–posthypophyseal tract. In contrast, labeling intensity for galanin remained steady. Finally, our double-face labeling supported a preferential routing of galanin-containing secretory granules towards dendrites.

(J Histochem Cytochem 52:617–627, 2004)

Key Words: • hypothalamus • vasopressin • galanin • electron microscopy • immunogold post-embedding • quantification • rat

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Callewaere, B. Fernette, D. Raison, P. Mechighel, A. Burlet, A. Calas, P. Kitabgi, S. M. Parsadaniantz, and W. Rostene Cellular and Subcellular Evidence for Neuronal Interaction between the Chemokine Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1/CXCL 12 and Vasopressin: Regulation in the Hypothalamo-Neurohypophysial System of the Brattleboro Rats Endocrinology, January 1, 2008; 149(1): 310 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact

The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 2004