Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact

DOI: 10.1369/jhc.4B6394.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liehr, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ziegler, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liehr, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ziegler, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
Volume 53 (3): 289-291, 2005
Copyright ©The Histochemical Society, Inc.


BRIEF REPORT

Rapid Prenatal Diagnostics in the Interphase Nucleus : Procedure and Cut-off Rates

Thomas Liehr and Monika Ziegler

Institute of Human Genetics and Anthropology, Jena, Germany

Correspondence to: Dr. Thomas Liehr, Institut für Humangenetik und Anthroplogie, Kollegiengasse 10, D-07743 Jena, Germany. E-mail: i8lith{at}mti.uni-jena.de

Results of a rapid prenatal aneuploidy screening in uncultured amniocytes using FISH are available within 24 hr. However, care has to be taken of possible pitfalls in connection with the commercially available probe sets and in the interpretation of results in general. Here we present our cut-off rates for and the way in which we handle the Aneu Vysion kit (ABBOTT/Vysis), based on the experience of 1200 studied cases. In summary, the method is reliable, and the risk for misdiagnosis is low (~0.4%). Nonetheless, the test should be used exclusively as a preamble to full chromosome analysis by microscopy.

(J Histochem Cytochem 53:289291, 2005)

Key Words: prenatal diagnosis • FISH • centromeric probes • locus-specific probes • pitfalls • cut-off


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Choolani, S.S.Y. Ho, K. Razvi, S. Ponnusamy, S. Baig, N.M. Fisk, A. Biswas, and and the Rapid Molecular Testing in Prenatal Diagno
FastFISH: technique for ultrarapid fluorescence in situ hybridization on uncultured amniocytes yielding results within 2 h of amniocentesis
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 13(6): 355 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 2005

 
Vector Laboratories: Leading the way in innovative reagents for immunohistochemistry