Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TAKANAMI, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TAKANAMI, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

THE SEPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SUBMICROSCOPIC COMPONENTS OF HEPATIC CYTOPLASM

MITURU TAKANAMI 1

1 The National Institute of Animal Health, Kodaira, Kitatama-gun, Tokyo, Japan

In an ultracentrifugal study on the cytoplasmic supernatant of rabbit liver, the following two principal components were separated from the supernatant by differential centrifugation and their biochemical properties investigated: (1) a granular substance sedimented at a rate of about 250s (250s component) and (2) a few macromolecular components the sedimentation rates of which were roughly in the range of from 40s to 100s (macromolecular components).

The 250s component, which was rich in lipids and easily disintegrated into smaller units by treatments of ultrasonic oscillation and of Nadesoxycholate, exhibited much higher activities of dipeptidase, acid and alkaline phosphatase than the macromolecular components. By contrast, the latter macromolecular components which belonged to ribonucleoprotein complexes exhibited comparatively high activities of RNase and esterase.

Uptake in vivo of radioactive phosphate (P32) by the RNA contained in the above two principal components markedly differed from each other. When the RNA contained in the 250s component was separated by the use of Nadesoxycholate into RNA in a non-sedimentable portion and that in a sedimentable portion corresponding to a ribonucleoprotein coplex, the RNA in the latter state showed an uptake rate extremely different from that of the macromolecular components. So it is emphasized that the ribonucleoprotein complex comprised in the 250s component and that existing free in the cytoplasm (i.e. macromolecular components) are metabolically different.

Submitted on October 3, 1958


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1959