BRIEF REPORT

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) on Human Chromosomes Using Photoprobe Biotin-labeled Probes

Correspondence to: Thomas Liehr, Institut für Humangenetik, Kollegiengasse 10, D-07743 Jena, Germany. E-mail: i8lith@mti.uni-jena.de

	Summary

Top Summary Introduction Protocol Literature Cited

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on human chromosomes in meta- and interphase is a well-established technique in clinical and tumor cytogenetics and for studies of evolution and interphase architecture. Many different protocols for labeling the DNA probes used for FISH have been published. Here we describe for the first time the successful use of Photoprobe biotin-labeled DNA probes in FISH experiments. Yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) and whole chromosome painting (wcp) probes were tested.

(J Histochem Cytochem 51:549–551, 2003)

Key Words: FISH, DNA labeling, Photoprobe system

	Introduction

Top Summary Introduction Protocol Literature Cited

THE STANDARD APPROACh applied in molecular cytogenetics is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). This technique is in use in clinical and tumor cytogenetics and in studies on chromosomal evolution and on the architecture of the interphase (for review see Liehr and Claussen 2002a , Liehr and Claussen 2002b , and internet http://mti-n.mti.uni-jena.de/~huwww/MOL_ZYTO/mFISHlit.htm). Apart from the standard protocols for DNA labeling such as nick translation (e.g. used in Liehr et al. 1995 ) and DOP-PCR (e.g., used in Liehr et al. 2002 ) other sophisticated labeling procedures have also been published (Samiotaki et al. 1997 ; Adarichev et al. 1998 ; Tanke et al. 1998 ; Wiegant et al. 1999 ; Henegariu et al. 2000 ; Nimmakayalu et al. 2000 ). Here we describe the successful use of Photoprobe biotin-labeled DNA probes (Forster et al. 1985 ) in FISH experiments for the first time.

The Photoprobe biotin labeling system (Linaris; Wertheim–Bettingen, Germany) is based on an aryl azide derivative of biotin with a positively charged spacer arm between the biotin and the azide group. Using this system, biotin is directly conjugated to the nucleic acid (single- or double-stranded) in just 20 min using heat. Incorporation is random and is not base-specific.

This approach has been tested successfully on microdissection-derived and DOP-PCR-amplified wcp probes (Senger et al. 1998 ). Examples for chromosomes 2 and 6 are shown in Fig 1A and Fig 1B, respectively. In addition, YAC probes for chromosome 2 have been labeled using the Photoprobe biotin-labeling system (an example is depicted in Fig 1C). The detection of biotin was done with an avidin–FITC/biotinylated antiavidin/avidin-FITC sandwich system (Linaris). The time for image acquisition in the FITC channel was between 0.6 and 1.8 sec for wcp and YAC probes. This is two to three times shorter than for the same probes labeled with biotin-dUTP by DOP-PCR.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Images were captured with the ISIS digital FISH imaging system (MetaSystems; Altlussheim, Germany) using a XC77 CCD camera with on-chip integration (Sony). FISH experiments were performed on chromosomes of a healthy female donor. The used probes were labeled with biotin using the Photoprobe biotin-labeling system (Linaris) and detected with an avidin–FITC/biotinylated anti-avidin/avidin–FITC sandwich system (green signals; Linaris). FISH results of a whole chromosome painting (wcp) probe for chromosome 2 (A), of a wcp probe for chromosome 6 (B), and of a YAC specific for 2q11.1-11.2, i.e., YAC774E9, kindly provided by Dr. M. Rocchi (Bari, Italy) (C,D) are presented. As depicted in D, not only is FISH on metaphase chromosomes possible with Photoprobe biotin-labeled probes but also interphase FISH. As expected, two specific green YAC signals (arrows) are visible in each metaphase and in each nucleus (C,D).

	Protocol

Top Summary Introduction Protocol Literature Cited

Two µg probe DNA [in our case probes were amplified by DOP-PCR (Telenius et al. 1992 )] dissolved in 20 µl of 1 x TE buffer (1 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) is mixed with 20 µl of Photoprobe biotin solution (Linaris; cat. no. LSP1000).

1. For thermal coupling the reaction mixture is overlaid with 20 µl of mineral oil and heated at 95C for 20 min in a heating block or a thermocycler. Afterwards the work is continued at room temperature.

2. Add 20 µl deionized water and 80 µl Tris buffer (pH 9.5) to the mixture.

3. To separate the phases, add 160 µl of 2-butanol (room temperature), vortex vigorously, and centrifuge at 3000 rpm for 30 sec.

4. Remove the upper butanol phase and discard.

5. Re-extract the aqueous phase with an additional 160 µl of 2-butanol as described previously and remove and discard the upper butanol phase.

6. Precipitate together with 10 µl sodium acetate (10 M) and 125 µl ethanol (-20C) at -80C for 20 min, centrifuge at 13,000 rpm, 4C for 15 min, remove the supernatant, wash in 70% ethanol, centrifuge again, and air-dry the pellet.

7. Dissolve the labeled DNA in 20 µl hybridization solution and perform a standard FISH procedure as previously described (Liehr et al. 1995 ).

In summary, we show for the first time the suitability of Photoprobe biotin-labeled probes for FISH approaches. Optimal FISH results could be obtained in metaphase (Fig 1A–1C) and interphase chromosomes (Fig 1D). The Photoprobe biotin-labeling system is simple to perform. Labeling can be done in less than 1 hr and the resulting FISH signals are more intense than labeling done with standard protocols. The latter might be due to the fact that in nick-translation and DOP-PCR, only one of the four nucleotides (mostly dUTP) is conjugated with biotin. Using the Photoprobe biotin labeling system a random and not base-specific chemical conjugation of the whole DNA strand is done, which seems to be more effective.

	Acknowledgments

Supported by the DFG (PO284/6-1), the INTAS (2143), the BLE (99HS039), and the Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung (99.105.1). The continuous support of the Carl Zeiss GmbH (Jena, Germany) is gratefully acknowledged.

Dr M. Rocchi (Bari, Italy) is acknowledged for YAC probes of chromosome 2.

Received for publication August 29, 2002; accepted November 20, 2002.

	Literature Cited

Top Summary Introduction Protocol Literature Cited

Adarichev VA, Kalachikov SM, Kiseliova AV, Dymshits GM (1998) Molecular hybridization probes prepared with 4-aminooxybutylamine. Bioconjug Chem 9:671-675[Medline]

Forster AC, McInnes JL, Skingle DC, Symons RH (1985) Non-radioactive hybridization probes prepared by the chemical labelling of DNA and RNA with a novel reagent, photobiotin. Nucleic Acids Res 13:745-761[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Henegariu O, Bray–Ward P, Ward DC (2000) Custom fluorescent-nucleotide synthesis as an alternative method for nucleic acid labeling. Nature Biotechnol 18:345-348[Medline]

Liehr T, Claussen U (2002a) Recent developments in human molecular cytogenetics. Curr Mol Med 2:283-297[Medline]

Liehr T, Claussen U (2002b) Multicolor-FISH approaches for the characterization of human chromosomes in clinical genetics and tumor cytogenetics. Curr Genet 3:213-235

Liehr T, Heller A, Starke H, Rubtsov N, Trifonov V, Mrasek K, Weise A et al. (2002) Microdissection based high resolution multicolor banding for all 24 human chromosomes. Int J Mol Med 9:335-339[Medline]

Liehr T, Thoma K, Kammler K, Gehring C, Ekici A, Bathke KD, Grehl H et al. (1995) Direct preparation of uncultured EDTA-treated or heparinized blood for interphase FISH analysis. Appl Cytogenet 21:185-188

Nimmakayalu M, Henegariu O, Ward DC, Bray–Ward P (2000) Simple method for preparation of fluor/hapten-labeled dUTP. Biotechniques 28:518-522[Medline]

Samiotaki M, Kwiatkowski M, Ylitalo N, Landegren U (1997) Seven-color time-resolved fluorescence hybridization analysis of human papilloma virus types. Anal Biochem 253:156-161[Medline]

Senger G, Chudoba I, Plesch A (1998) Multicolor-FISH—the identification of chromosome aberrations by 24 colors. Bioforum 9:499-503

Tanke HJ, De Haas RR, Sagner G, Ganser M, van Gijlswijk RP (1998) Use of platinum coproporphyrin and delayed luminescence imaging to extend the number of targets in FISH karyotyping. Cytometry 33:453-459[Medline]

Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Tunnacliffe A, Carter NP, Behmel A, Ferguson–Smith MA, Nordenskjold M et al. (1992) Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 4:257-263[Medline]

Wiegant JC, van Gijlswijk RP, Heetebrij RJ, Bezrookove V, Raap AK, Tanke HJ (1999) ULS: a versatile method of labeling nucleic acids for FISH based on a monofunctional reaction of cisplatin derivatives with guanine moieties. Cytogenet Cell Genet 87:47-52[Medline]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weise, A. Articles by Liehr, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weise, A. Articles by Liehr, T. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact