DOI: 10.1369/jhc.4A6249.2004 Volume 52 (6): 813-820, 2004 Copyright ©The Histochemical Society, Inc. Quantification of In Situ Hybridization Signals in Rat Testes
Department of Cytology and Histology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, Okayama, Japan Correspondence to: Junzo Sasaki, MD, PhD, Dept. of Cytology and Histology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Okayama 700-8558, Japan. E-mail:sasakij{at}md.okayama-u.ac.jp
We performed basic research into quantifying in situ hybridization (ISH) signals in rat testis, a suitable organ for the quantification because germ cells undergo synchronized development and show stage-specific gene expression. In this model experiment, rRNA was selected as the hybridizable RNA in paraffin sections. Specimens fixed with Bouin's fixative and hybridized with digoxygenin-labeled probes could easily be analyzed quantitatively through "posterization" of the images. The amount of rRNA hybridized with the probe was greatest in early primary spermatocytes, followed by pachytene primary spermatocytes, then diplotene spermatocytes, and finally by secondary spermatocytes and spermatids. The amounts reached low levels in metaphase, anaphase, and telophase of meiotic division and early step 1 spermatids, and then slightly increased during spermiogenesis. ISH rRNA staining was a useful parameter for evaluation of the quantitative analysis of mRNA and the levels of hybridizable RNA in tissue sections. (J Histochem Cytochem 52:813820, 2004)
Key Words: quantification posterization in situ hybridization rat testis ribosomal RNA
DNA ARRAY ANALYSIS can reveal the underlying genes and proteins involved in pathological and physiological changes. However, it cannot detect the cells in which such molecules are up- and/or downregulated, information needed to understand the role of the constituent cells of tissues that react to such changes. To analyze the data from cDNA array analyses in full, it is essential to localize gene products in tissue sections by quantitative in situ hybridization (ISH).
We have studied the gene expression of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-related enzymes in the reproductive organs using ISH histochemistry (Sasaki et al. 1994
Radioactive ISH quantitations have been used extensively in the field of neuroscience (Baskin and Stahl 1993 In this study we tried to quantify ISH signals using a posterization of images of the rat testis. This strategy revealed differences in the amounts of rRNA during spermatogenesis.
All animal experiments were performed according to the Guidelines for Animal Experiments of the Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry. All reagents were of the highest grade commercially available.
Tissue Preparation
Probe Preparation For the control experiment, unlabeled probes or DIG-labeled 34-mer oligonucleotides of random sequences were prepared.
An alternative DIG-labeled probe was prepared using a multilabeling method (Sasaki et al. 1998
Hybridization
For the classification of spermatogenesis in rat testes, the serial sections were stained with periodic acidSchiff (PAS)hematoxylin (Hess 1990
Quantification of Signals
Figure 1 shows the detection of 28S rRNA with DIG probes (Figures 1a and 1c) and ML probes (Figures 1b and 1d) in 4% PA-fixed (Figures 1a and 1b) and Bouin's-fixed (Figures 1c and 1d) paraffin sections. Compared with the brownish color depth, which was a final enzymatic product resulting from the conjugation of alkaline phosphatase with anti-DIG antibodies, round spermatids at stage VII in 4% PA-fixed sections hybridized with ML probes (Figure 1b) showed the most intense positive signals among the four cases under the routine experimental conditions described in Materials and Methods. For control experiments, DIG-labeled 34-mer oligonucleotides of random sequences and sense ML probes for rRNA were used for the experiments using DIG-labeled probes (Figures 1a and 1c) and ML probes (Figures 1b and 1d), respectively (data not shown).
However, in the 4% PA-fixed sections, the fixation caused shrinkage of the seminiferous tubules, resulting in a widening of the lymphatic space among the tubules (Figures 1a and 1b, arrows). For this reason, the quantitative analysis was performed using the Bouin's-fixed sections shown in Figure 1d. Figure 2a shows rat testis hybridized with antisense ML probes for rRNA. The brownish color shows the presence of 28S rRNAs. Figure 2b shows rat testis hybridized with sense ML probes for rRNA, in which specific signals were not observed.
To quantify RNA signals, it was essential that the signals were not distributed unevenly among seminiferous tubules. It was postulated that the germ cells at the same stage of development in neighboring tubules express the same level of rRNA. We obtained reproducible results in several tubules. The top left tubules in Figures 3a and 3c show stage V, and both the center tubule in Figure 3a and the bottom right tubule in Figure 3c show stage IX. These sets of tubules show equal levels of rRNA. The top right tubule in Figure 3a, center right tubule in Figure 3c, bottom left tubule in Figure 3e, and top center tubule in Figure 3g show stage XIV, as determined by the presence of mitotic figures and/or secondary spermatocytes. Dividing cells (Me1 and Me2) in these tubules showed equal levels of rRNA. The reaction products in secondary spermatocytes were weaker than those in diplotene spermatocytes (D) (Figures 3a, 3c, 3e,and 3g), and early step 1 spermatids contained very small amounts of rRNA (Figure 3g).
From these findings (Figures 3a3g), we considered the results to be reproducible. Next, we analyzed the data quantitatively. The analysis of rRNA amounts in spermatogonia was not performed by posterization because the cell numbers were too small and the effect of overlapping cells was not negligible. The specimens fixed with Bouin's fixative and hybridized with ML probes could easily be analyzed quantitatively using a posterization of the images (Figures 3b, 3d, 3f, and 3h). Images were separated into five tones from dark to light, expressed as numerals from grade 5 to grade 1 as described in Materials and Methods. The mean value of each cell population was obtained from five or six tubules, and the results are summarized in Figure 4 . The amount of rRNA hybridizable with the probe was grade 5 black in early primary spermatocytes, grade 4 dark gray in primary spermatocytes, grade 3 gray in diplotene spermatocytes, and grade 2 light gray or grade 1 white in spermatids.
Fixation Methods and Intensity of ISH Preservation of the tissue structure was essential for the quantification of signals obtained with the histochemical protocol. The testis is a suitable organ for quantification because germ cells undergo synchronized development and often show stage-specific expression of their genes. However, it was not easy to preserve the structure of the organs sufficiently. We applied the fixation method of Sprando (1990)
rRNA as a Positive Control for ISH The probe sequence was complementary to a well-conserved segment of 28S rRNA among species, so it could be used in the preparation of tissues from a wide range of species. Because proteinase digestion influenced the detectable amount of mRNA in paraffin sections of formalin-fixed tissues, it influenced the ISH rRNA staining intensity. Therefore, this probe could be used for assessments of RNA integrity and hybridizability in tissue sections, especially when false-negative results might be a problem in retrospective studies using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.
Molecules other than rRNA, such as EF-1
rRNA and Synthetic Activity
Perspectives and Conclusions
Many problems have been overcome for the quantification of mRNA in tissue sections. The first problem was whether or not there was linearity between the probe concentration and the ISH signals. Larsson and Hougaard (1994) ISH signals usually reflect only relative changes in the copy number of a gene and a relative assessment of the amount of signal in the section. Evaluations using + or ++ may be possible, although this does not show the dual change in the amount of signal. For a precise quantitative analysis of ISH signals, the use of fluorescence may be essential, and fluorescence-labeled probes are being developed. Fluorescence-positive signals quantified under a confocal microscope will enable precise analyses using ISH.
Supported by Grants in Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. We are grateful to Mr Shigeto Kanda (Department of Cytology and Histology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry) for technical assistance.
Received for publication January 2, 2004; accepted January 29, 2004
Baskin DG, Stahl WL (1993) Fundamentals of quantitative autoradiography by computer densitometry for in situ hybridization, with emphasis on 33P. J Histochem Cytochem 41:17671776[Abstract] Gruber AD, Levine RA (1997) In situ assessment of mRNA accessibility in heterogeneous tissue samples using elongation factor-1 alpha (EF-1 alpha). Histochem Cell Biol 107:411416[Medline] Guiot Y, Rahier J (1995) The effects of varying key steps in the non-radioactive in situ hybridization protocol: a quantitative study. Histochem J 27:6068[CrossRef][Medline] Hess RA (1990) Quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the stages and transitions in the cycle of the rat seminiferous epithelium: light microscopic observations of perfusion-fixed and plastic-embedded testes. Biol Reprod 43:525542[Abstract] Koulouri O, Lappin DF, Radvar M, Kinane DF (1999) Cell division, synthetic capacity and apoptosis in periodontal lesions analysed by in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry. J Clin Periodontol 26:552559[CrossRef][Medline] Larsson LI (1997) Quantitative in situ hybridization. Endocrin Pathol 8:39 Larsson LI, Hougaard DM (1990) Optimization of non-radioactive in situ hybridization: image analysis of varying pretreatment, hybridization and probe labelling conditions. Histochemistry 93:347354[CrossRef][Medline] Larsson LI, Hougaard DM (1994) Glass slide models for immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. Histochemistry 101:325331[CrossRef][Medline] Macville MV, Van Dorp AG, Dirks RW, Fransen JA, Raap AK (1996) Evaluation of pepsin treatment for electron microscopic RNA in situ hybridization on ultra-thin cryosections of cultured cells. Histochem Cell Biol 105:139145[CrossRef][Medline] McCabe JT, Bolender RP (1993) Estimation of tissue mRNAs by in situ hybridization. J Histochem Cytochem 41:17771783[Abstract] Monesi V, Geremia R, D'Agostino A, Boitani C (1978) Biochemistry of male germ cell differentiation in mammals: RNA synthesis in meiotic and postmeiotic cells. Curr Top Dev Biol 12:1136[Medline] Mori H, Nomura T, Seno M, Miki Y, Kimura T, Kogami T, Sasaki J (2001) Expression of phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (PHGPx) mRNA in rat testes. Acta Histochem Cytochem 31:275279[CrossRef] Nomura T, Sasaki J, Mori H, Sato EF, Watanabe S, Kanda S, Matsuura J, et al. (1996) Expression of manganese superoxide dismutase mRNA in reproductive organs during the ovulatory process and the estrous cycle of the rat. Histochem Cell Biol 105:16[CrossRef][Medline] Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED (1990) Staging for laboratory species. In Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Clearwater, FL, Cache River Press, 62194 Salem C, El-Alfy M, Leblond CP (1998) Changes in the rate of RNA synthesis during the cell cycle. Anat Rec 250:612[CrossRef][Medline] Sasaki J, Sato EF, Nomura T, Mori H, Watanabe S, Kanda S, Watanabe H, et al. (1994) Detection of manganese superoxide dismutase mRNA in the theca interna cells of rat ovary during the ovulatory process by in situ hybridization. Histochemistry 102:173176[CrossRef][Medline] Sasaki J, Yamamoto H, Nomura T, Matsuura J, Seno M, Sato EF, Inoue M (1998) Multiple-labeling of oligonucleotide probes for in situ hybridization. Acta Histochem Cytochem 31:275279 Schmid M, Hofgartner FJ, Zenzes MT, Engel W (1977) Evidence for postmeiotic expression of ribosomal RNA genes during male gametogenesis. Hum Genet 38:279284[CrossRef][Medline] Singer RH, Lawrence JB, Villnave C (1986) Optimization of in situ hybridization using isotopic and non-isotopic deletion methods. Biotechniques 4:230250 Slowinski J, Mazurek U, Bierzynska-Macyszyn G (2002) Histone mRNA in situ hybridization in assessing proliferative activity of normal and malignant cells. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 40:335339[Medline] Soderstrom KO, Parvinen M (1976) RNA synthesis in different stages of rat seminiferous epithelial cycle. Mol Cell Endocrinol 5:181199[CrossRef][Medline] Sprando RL (1990) Perfusion of the rat testis through the heart using heparin. In Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED, eds. Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Clearwater, FL, Cache River Press, 277280 Stefanini M, De Martino C, D'Agostino A, Agrestini A, Monesi V (1974) Nucleolar activity of rat primary spermatocytes. Exp Cell Res 86:166170[CrossRef][Medline] Yoshii A, Koji T, Ohsawa N, Nakane PK (1995) In situ localization of ribosomal RNAs is a reliable reference for hybridizable RNA in tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem 43:321327[Abstract]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||