Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
Originally published as JHC exPRESS on May 18, 2006.
doi:10.1369/jhc.5A6903.2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jhc.5A6903.2006v1
54/9/1031    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckert, C.
Right arrow Articles by Müller, W. E.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eckert, C.
Right arrow Articles by Müller, W. E.G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
Volume 54 (9): 1031-1040, 2006
Copyright ©The Histochemical Society, Inc.

Histochemical and Electron Microscopic Analysis of Spiculogenesis in the Demosponge Suberites domuncula

Carsten Eckert, Heinz C. Schröder, David Brandt, Sanja Perovic-Ottstadt and Werner E.G. Müller

Museum für Naturkunde, Universität, Institut für Systematische Zoologie, Berlin, Germany (CE), and Institut für Physiologische Chemie, Abteilung Angewandte Molekularbiologie, Universität, Mainz, Germany (HCS,DB,SP-O,WEGM)

Correspondence to: Prof. Dr. W.E.G. Müller, Institut für Physiologische Chemie, Abteilung Angewandte Molekularbiologie, Universität, Duesbergweg 6, 55099 Mainz; Germany. E-mail: wmueller{at}uni-mainz.de


    Summary
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
The skeleton of demosponges is built of spicules consisting of biosilica. Using the primmorph system from Suberites domuncula, we demonstrate that silicatein, the biosilica-synthesizing enzyme, and silicase, the catabolic enzyme, are colocalized at the surface of growing spicules as well as in the axial filament located in the axial canal. It is assumed that these two enzymes are responsible for the deposition of biosilica. In search of additional potential structural molecules that might guide the mineralization process during spiculogenesis to species-specific spicules, electron microscopic studies with antibodies against galectin and silicatein were performed. These studies showed that silicatein forms a complex with galectin; the strings/bundles of this complex are intimately associated with the surface of the spicules and arranged concentrically around them. Collagen fibers are near the silactein/galectin complexes. The strings/bundles formed from silicatein/galectin display a lower degree of orientation than the collagen fibers arranged in a highly ordered pattern around the spicules. These data indicate that species-specific formation of spicules involves a network of (diffusible) regulatory factor(s) controlling enzymatic silica deposition; this mineralization process proceeds on a galectin/collagen organic matrix. (J Histochem Cytochem 54:1031–1040, 2006)

Key Words: sponges • Porifera • Suberites domuncula • spicules • biosilica • silicatein • silicase • collagen • galectin


    Introduction
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
IN METAZOA, skeletal elements are the major structural requirements for the architectural pattern formation of body plans. The skeleton can be formed from water (soft-bodied animals), organic fibers, and cementing material (cuticle) of inorganic substances (calcified connective tissue, e.g., bone or silicified components or spicules in sponges). The phylum Porifera (sponges) is divided into three classes, Hexactinellida and Demospongiae that comprise a siliceous skeleton and the Calcarea with a calcareous skeletal network (Bergquist 1978Go). The main elements of the skeletons are termed spicules and also serve as major systematic characters for a given sponge species (Schulze and v Lendenfeld 1889Go). Since the comprehensive studies of Bütschli (1901)Go and Minchin (1909)Go, a descriptive view on the synthesis of the siliceous spicules has been well established.

In Demospongiae, initiation of spicule formation starts intracellularly within specialized cells called sclerocytes. There an axial filament is assembled in organelles around which the first siliceous deposits are layered (Müller et al. 2006Go), thus forming the nucleus and initial growth form of a spicule. The first siliceous layers surrounding the axial canal measure 1–2 µm in diameter (Uriz et al. 2000Go). When reaching lengths of ~5–10 µm, spicules are extruded from the cells into the mesohyl where their final sizes and shapes are completed. Thickening of spicules proceeds by apposition of concentric silica layers (Uriz et al. 2000Go; Müller et al. 2006Go). In recent years, the molecular basis of spicule formation has been elucidated in some detail. Silicon is actively taken up by demosponges through a membrane-bound transporter, which can very likely be grouped to the family of Na+/HCO3 cotransporters (Schröder et al. 2004aGo). Intracellularly, polycondensation of silicic acid is mediated enzymatically through the enzyme silicatein (Shimizu et al. 1998Go; Weaver and Morse 2003Go). Several isoforms of silicatein have been identified in Tethya aurantium and termed silicatein-{alpha}, -ß, and -{gamma} (Shimizu et al. 1998Go). Subsequently, silicateins have been identified in other demosponges such as Suberites domuncula (Müller et al. 2003Go,2006Go) and Lubomirskia baicalensis (Kaluzhnaya et al. 2005Go).

Forms and sizes of spicules are highly diverse (Boury-Esnault and Rützler 1997Go). Because the morphology of the spicules differs species-specifically, they are used as a major taxonomic character. However, very little is known about the molecular mechanism(s) that determine the position and arrangement of the spicules within the demosponge skeleton (Uriz et al. 2003Go). Based on experimental evidence, it was proposed that collagen fibrils, adhesive proteins, and polysaccharides are those elements that transport the spicules to their functional position within the sponge body (Garrone 1978Go,1984Go,1998). However, structural macromolecules that regulate and control the growth of spicules remained obscure, very likely because growth of spicules is a rapid process. It was calculated that longitudinal growth of spicules proceeds at a velocity of 5 µm/hr (Weissenfels 1989Go). Investigation of spicule formation under controlled conditions became possible after the successful establishment of the sponge tissue culture system, a special form of three-dimensional cell aggregates. These aggregates are composed of proliferating and differentiating cells (termed primmorph system) (Müller et al. 1999Go).

In the present study, using microscopic analyses we show that the two enzymes, silicatein, the major biosilica-forming enzyme (Weaver and Morse 2003Go), and silicase, the biosilica-catabolic enzyme (Schröder et al. 2003Go), are colocalized during synthesis of silica depositions. Furthermore, microscopic data are presented indicating that two structural molecules, galectin and collagen, are involved in control of growth and shape formation of spicules. Our data suggest that galectin organizes silicatein molecules to form primary strings/bundles and allows the matrix-guided deposition of the first biosilica deposits. In a second step, these structures are directed by collagen fibers very likely in a concentric pattern around the spicules. The view that spicule formation is under the control of regulatory factors came from the identification of the sponge osteoclast-stimulating factor. The first factor, potentially involved in osteoclast formation, is this osteoclast-stimulating factor whose sequence was reported in the database (accession number AAH07459). Data presented in the manuscript experimentally support the view (Weiner and Dove 2003Go) that mineralization of spicules is a biologically controlled extracellular process.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
Materials
Restriction enzymes and reagents for RACE procedure were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Cy3-conjugated F(ab')2 goat anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch (Cambridgshire, UK).

Sponges and Primmorphs
Specimens of the marine sponge Suberites domuncula (Porifera, Demospongiae, Hadromerida) were collected in the Northern Adriatic near Rovinj, Croatia and then kept in aquaria in Mainz, Germany at a temperature of 17C for >5 months. In one series of experiments, a tissue sample from a specimen was treated for 30 min in seawater supplemented with 30 mM EDTA at room temperature. Spicules were then obtained by sedimentation and processed for in situ hybridization.

The in vitro primmorph cell system was used (Krasko et al. 2000Go). Primmorphs were kept at 17C in natural seawater (enriched with 60 µM of silicate) and supplemented with 1% RPMI 1640 medium. Approximately 20 days later the primmorphs were used for analysis.

Cloning of the Osteoclast-stimulating Factor
In a screening program for the osteoclast-stimulating factor, degenerate primers deduced from the conserved first ankyrin domain of the human osteoclast-stimulating factor (accession number AAH07459), spanning the stretch aa76 to aa82, were used. Polymerase chain reaction was performed on the total S. domuncula cDNA library prepared in a Lambda ZAP Express vector (Kruse et al. 1997Go). Fragments of the expected size were obtained, cloned, and sequenced. The sequence was completed with insert-specific primers in combination with 5'-RACE primer or with 3'-RACE primer using the CapFishing Full-length cDNA Premix Kit (Seegene; Rockville, MD). The final sequence was confirmed by an additional PCR using primers directed against the non-translated region of the cDNA, followed by sequencing. The clone encoding S. domuncula cDNA for the osteoclast-stimulating factor (SDOSTF) is 739-nt long; cDNA for the putative SDOSTF has been deposited (EMBL/GenBank) under AM167903.

Preparation of Antibodies
Polyclonal antibodies (PoAb) were raised against purified, recombinant silicatein (rSILIC_SUBDO), recombinant galectin (rGALEC_SUBDO), and recombinant silicase (rSIA_SUBDO) in female rabbits (White New Zealand) as described (Schröder et al. 2003Go; Wiens et al. 2003Go; Müller et al. 2005Go). Titers of the antibodies PoAb-aSILIC, PoAb-aGALEC, and PoAb-aSIA were >1:3000.

Electron Microscopy
Transmission Electron Microscopic (TEM) Analysis
For TEM, primmorph specimens were cut into pieces and incubated in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (supplemented with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 0.82% NaCl, pH 7.4) and finally washed in 0.1 M phosphate/1.75% NaCl buffer, pH 7.4, at room temperature. After treating the samples with 1.25% NaHCO3, 2% OsO4, and 1% NaCl, they were dehydrated with ethanol. Dried samples were incubated with propylene oxide, fixed in propylene oxide/araldite (2:1), covered with pure araldite, and hardened at 60C for 2 days prior to cutting into 60-nm ultrathin slices (Ultracut S; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Samples were transferred onto coated copper grids and analyzed with a Tecnai 12 microscope (FEI Electron Optics; Eindhoven, The Netherlands).

Electron Immunogold Labeling
Primmorph samples were treated in 0.1% glutaraldehyde/3% paraformaldehyde buffered in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. After 2 hr the material was dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in LR-White Resin. Sixty-nm-thick slices were cut and blocked with 5% BSA in PBS and then incubated with the primary antibody PoAb-aSILIC (1:1000) or PoAb-aGALEC (1:1000) for 12 hr at 4C. In controls, preimmune serum was used. After three washes with PBS/1% BSA, sections were incubated with 1:100 dilution of the secondary antibody (1.4-nm nanogold anti-rabbit IgG; diluted 1:200) for 2 hr. Sections were rinsed in PBS, treated with 1% glutaraldehyde/PBS for 5 min, washed, and dried. Subsequently, immunocomplex enhancement was performed with silver as described (Danscher 1981Go). Samples were examined as above with the Tecnai 12 microscope.

Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) Analysis
Sponge specimens were analyzed by SEM, and samples were mounted on stubs (carbon adhesive Leit-Tabs #G 3347; Plano, Wetzlar, Germany) and observed with a Zeiss DSM 962 digital scanning microscope (Zeiss; Aalen, Germany).

In Situ Localization Studies
The method applied bases on a described procedure (Polak and McGee 1998Go; Perovic et al. 2003Go). Eight-µm-thick frozen sections through tissue were prepared, fixed, treated with proteinase K, and subsequently fixed again with paraformaldehyde. After rehydration, sections were hybridized with the labeled probe, a 200-nt-long SDOSTF cDNA portion. After blocking, sections were incubated with an anti-digoxigenin antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase. The dye reagent NBT/X-Phosphate was used for visualization of the signals. Antisense and sense ssDNA digoxigenin-labeled probes were synthesized by PCR using the PCR DIG Probe synthesis Kit (Roche; Mannheim, Germany). Sense probes were used in parallel as negative controls in the experiments.

The cells surrounding and associated with spicules were isolated from sponge tissue as described and hybridized under the same conditions with the collagen probe. A recently described cDNA encoding fibrillar collagen-3 (SDCOLL3) was used (Schröder et al. 2006Go), accession number AM157177, choosing a 400-nt portion comprising the collagen triple helix repeats.

Immunohistology
Primmorph/tissue samples were embedded and 8-µm frozen sections were obtained as described (Perovic et al. 2003Go). Cryosections were fixed, washed and then incubated with the first antibody (PoAb-aSILIC or PoAb-aSIA; 1:1000 dilution), blocked and then subjected with the second antibody (Cy3-conjugated F(ab')2 goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:2000 dilution). Immunofluorescence analysis was done with an Olympus AHBT3 light microscope (Olympus; Tokyo, Japan) together with an AH3-RFC reflected light fluorescence attachment at the emission wavelength 546 nm (filter G).


    Results
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
Co-localization of Silicatein and Silicase in Primmorphs
Cryosections through primmorphs were prepared and stained with PoAbs raised against recombinant silicase (PoAb-aSIA) and silicatein (PoAb-aSILIC) from S. domuncula. Inspection by fluorescence light microscopy revealed that these two antibodies stained fibrillar structures in primmorphs (Figures 1A and 1C). In parallel, these long-fibered structures had been visualized by Nomarsky optics (Figures 1B and 1D).


Figure 1
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1

Immunostaining of cryosections through primmorphs (AD) or tissue (E,F) of Suberites domuncula. The 8-µm frozen sections were reacted with polyclonal antibodies against silicase (PoAb-aSIA) (A) or silicatein (PoAb-aSILIC) (C), as described under Materials and Methods. Parallel Nomarsky images are shown (B,D), which correspond to the immunostained sections (A,C). Some of those long-fibered structures visualized by fluorescence microscopy and by Nomarsky optics are marked (>). (E,F) Tissue sections were prepared and similarly reacted with PoAb-aSIA or PoAb-aSILIC. Signals of the immunocomplexes are seen on the surface of the spicules (sp) and also in the axial canals where the axial filaments exist (af).

 
To support that silicase and silicatein proteins are recognized by antigens associated with the spicules, sections through tissue were performed. After immunostaining, strong signals resulting from reactions with PoAb-aSIA (Figure 1E) or with PoAb-aSILIC (Figure 1F) could be detected. Immunocomplexes were seen on the surface of the spicules and in the axial filaments residing in the axial canals.

Osteoclast-stimulating Factor, the Gene/Protein, and Its Expression
The S. domuncula polypeptide encoding the putative osteoclast-stimulating factor was identified and cloned from the cDNA library of S. domuncula. The 739-nt-long sequence (SDOSTF) has an open reading frame nt70/72 to nt703/705 (stop) that codes for the 211-aa-long protein (OSTF_SUBDO; Figure 2A ). The size of this molecule is 23,049 Da. Motif scan analysis revealed three ankyrin repeats (aa76 to aa108, aa109 to aa142, and aa143 to aa175) as well as one SH3 motif. The highest sequence similarity is seen with the human protein, the osteoclast-stimulating factor 1, with 66% similar and 53% identical amino acids. The similarity score to the protostomian sequence from Caenorhabditis elegans (osteoclast-stimulating factor 1) is lower. Similarities to the Drosophila melanogaster-deduced protein (CG4719-PA) and the probable ankyrin protein from Arabidopsis thaliana are <50%. This relationship is also reflected by the rooted phylogenetic tree (Figure 2B).


Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2

Osteoclast-stimulating factor in S. domuncula. (A) The sponge-deduced protein (OSTF_SUBDO) was aligned with the corresponding human protein (OSTF1_HUMAN; AAH07459). Similar amino acids are in inverted type. Three characteristic ankyrin motifs are delimited (ANK); in addition, one SH3 motif is present (http://myhits.isb-sib.ch/cgi-bin/motif_scan). (B) The phylogenetic tree was computed from these two proteins together with the osteoclast-stimulating factor 1 from Caenorhabditis elegans (OSTFl_CAEEL; NP_492738.1), the predicted CG4719-PA protein from Drosophila melanogaster (CG4719_DROME; NP_651410.1), and the probable ankyrin protein from Arabidopsis thaliana (ANK_ARATH; D84448). The tree was rooted with the plant protein. (C) In situ hybridization analysis (S. domuncula tissue) applying the probe for this factor. (C',C'') Antisense probe (SDOSTF) showed strong signals in those cells closely associated with the spicules (sp). (C''') Sense probe was used as a control.

 
In situ hybridization studies were performed to elucidate in which cells the gene for the osteoclast-stimulating factor is expressed. Applying the antisense probe (SDOSTF), strong signals are seen in cells surrounding the spicules (Figures 2C2C' and 2C''). Controls have been performed with the sense probe, which gave no signal after hybridization (Figures 2C2C''').

Extra-spicular Association of Silicatein with Galectin
Using antibodies against silicatein (PoAb-aSILIC) and galectin (PoAb-aGALEC), the association of silicatein with galectin in the extraspicular space in primmorphs was determined by electron immunogold labeling. Sections through primmorphs were reacted with antibodies against silicatein (Figures 3A3C) and galectin (Figures 3E3H). The gold signals coming from the PoAb-aSILIC/gold complexes are arranged around the cross-section through spicules in primmorphs in concentric patterns (Figures 3A and 3B). At higher magnification it can be distinguished that the rings are composed of strings/bundles that react with the PoAb-aSILIC/gold complexes (Figure 3C). The siliceous shells of the growing spicules are visible as electron-dense deposits around the axial filament (Figure 3B). In sections that were performed at the tip of a growing spicule, little of the siliceous shell can be recognized (Figure 3A). To demonstrate that the immunoreactions are specific, preimmune serum was used. In those images no gold complexes are seen (Figure 3D).


Figure 3
View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3

Association of silicatein with galectin in the extraspicular space in primmorphs; analysis by electron immunogold labeling. Sections through primmorphs were performed and reacted with antibodies against silicatein (PoAb-aSILIC) (AC) and galectin (PoAb-aGALEC) (EH). In one sample the sections were treated with preimmune serum, taken prior to the immunization of the rabbit with silicatein (D). In some images the siliceous spicules (sp) or the axial filaments (af) are marked.

 
In parallel to the anti-silicatein antibodies, antibodies against galectin were applied. The reaction of these antibodies is visible in those structures that surround the spicules concentrically (Figures 3E3H). At higher magnification the accumulated gold complexes, associated with electron dense strings/bundles, are clearly detected (Figure 3H). Control studies with preimmune serum gave no signals here (not shown).

Localization of Collagen in the Vicinity of Spicules
TEM of osmium-fixed samples was performed to visualize the collagen network (Figure 4 ). Again the primmorph system was used to analyze spicules during their growing phase. After release into the mesohyl, spicules are only occasionally associated with cells (Figure 4A). In most images the spicules are surrounded by the bulky extracellular matrix of the mesohyl into which the fibers are embedded (Figures 4B4C). At an average magnification an organized network of collagen fibers can be seen, especially at the tip of growing spicules (Figure 4B) arranged longitudinally to the spicules. In the center of the spicules both cross-sections through collagen fibers and through longitudinally orientated fibers are seen (Figure 4C). At higher magnification the less fibrous structured strings/bundles are visualized, located between the collagen fibers and the spicules (Figures 4D4F). Finally, at highest magnification it is apparent that the strings are closely associated with the siliceous spicules, whereas collagen fibers end at a distance of 150 µm in front of the spicules (Figures 4G4I).


Figure 4
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4

Transmission electron microscopy analysis of primmorphs. Osmium-fixed samples were processed as described under Materials and Methods. (A) Cell protrusions (cp) are visible at lower magnifications. At higher magnification at the tip of growing spicules (B) or in the middle part of the spicules (C), either cross-sections through collagen (col) fibers or fibers in their longitudinal orientation are seen. (DF) Between the collagen fibers and the spicules (sp), the less fibrously structured strings (st) exist. At highest magnification it becomes obvious that the strings are closely associated with the spicules, whereas collagen (col) appears more distantly from the spicules (GI).

 
Organized Collagen Web Surrounds Spicules
SEM analysis was applied to demonstrate the complex collagen network surrounding the spicules within tissue from adult specimens (Figure 5 ). An organized collagen web surrounds the spicules (Figure 5A); the images show fibers that follow the orientation and the shape of the spicules. Only at the ends of the spicules, which in adult specimens are tylostyles where the knobs have formed, a mesh-like arrangement of the collagen fibers is seen (Figures 5B and 5C). In the midportion of the spicules, less filamentous strings are seen, which are layered between the collagen fibers and the surface of the spicules (Figures 5D and 5E).


Figure 5
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis through tissue. Collagen fibers surround the spicules (sp) in an organized manner (A). (B,C) Around the ends of the tylostyles, a mesh-like arrangement of the collagen fibers (col) is visualized. (D,E) SEM analysis of the midportion of the spicules show less filamentous strings (st) between the collagen fibers and the surface of the spicules.

 
Expression of Collagen in Cells Associated with Spicules
To demonstrate that the cells surrounding the spicules express collagen, spicule samples were prepared with their associated cells. After in situ hybridization with a probe for the fibrillar collagen-3 gene from S. domuncula, strong signals are seen after the reaction with the antisense probe (Figure 6A ), whereas the sense probe reacted only weakly (Figure 6B).


Figure 6
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6

Expression of the gene encoding fibrillar collagen-3 in cells surrounding the spicules (sp); analysis by in situ hybridization. (A) The antisense probe of fibrillar collagen-3 (SDCOLL3) strongly reacted with the surrounding cells, whereas the sense probe reacted only weakly (B).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
Mineralization of those structures in metazoans that have a species-specific form is biologically controlled; this implies that a differential gene activity controls the nucleation, growth, and final localization of the mineral deposits (Weiner and Dove 2003Go). It is known from vertebrate bones that the individual morphology of the bones is the result of tuned modeling and remodeling processes under genetic as well as epigenetic control (Garant 2003Go). The earliest metazoans, the siliceous sponges, are composed of species-specific and highly complex skeletal elements, the spicules. During the past few years, the first clues on the genomic regulatory systems that control spiculogenesis have been described. These animals having a distinct body plan and, in at least some species, a pronounced axis do not contain homeobox gene clusters. However, the genetic repertoire of Porifera is complex enough to allow the formation of amazingly diverse spicules, the structural basis for the species-specific phenotypes (Müller 2005Go). Axis formation, e.g., in branches from some species, is controlled by differential expression of an apoptotic gene, as demonstrated for L. baicalensis (Wiens et al. 2006Go). At present, however, the processes through which the cells control the spatial and temporal pattern of spicule formation are not known. Recent results of in vitro studies suggested that anabolic (silicatein) as well as catabolic enzymes (silicase) are involved in the establishment of the well-structured inorganic skeletal elements, at least in demosponges (Schröder et al. 2003Go). In addition, it can be postulated that matrix-mediated signaling and growth/differentiation factors regulate spiculo-/skeletogenesis as well.

The studies presented herein show that during spicule formation in primmorphs of S. domuncula, expression of both silicatein and silicase is seen at those sites within the three-dimensional cell aggregates where the growth/building of these siliceous structures starts. Silicateins present in the axial filament of the spicules are enzymes that synthesize biosilica in vitro (Cha et al. 1999Go; Krasko et al. 2000Go,2002Go) and belong to the family of proteolytic enzymes (cathepsins). The role of the silicateins as synthesizing enzymes in vivo was elucidated by in situ hybridization studies (Schröder et al. 2004bGo). In the present study, immunofluorescence analyses have been applied to demonstrate that in primmorphs silicatein is associated with the fibrous structures that represent the primordial spicules. In parallel with the application of anti-silicatein it could be shown that the silica-catabolizing enzyme (silicase) is also localized at the same structures within the primmorphs. This result was supported by immunofluorescence studies of sections through tissue samples. Like silicatein(s), silicase belongs to a protein family known as carbonic anhydrases (Hatch 1980; Martin and Udagawa 1998Go; Schröder et al. 2003Go). Silicase has been shown to mediate dissolution of biosilica (Schröder et al. 2003Go). From this finding, a functional aspect can be deduced, suggesting that as in other inorganic skeletal structures such as in the osteons of the vertebrate bones (Garant 2003Go), mineralization/deposition of biosilica of the spicules is a result of synthesizing and catabolizing enzymes.

It remains enigmatic which factors/structural macromolecules guide biosilica deposition to its functional location and allow the formation of the species-specific appearance of the spicules. Advances in tissue culture techniques in sponges and the analysis of the genome complexity of sponges, especially in S. domuncula, allowed for the first time the identification of a putative factor, presumably involved in spicule formation, the osteoclast-stimulating factor (OSTF_SUBDO). Osteoclast-stimulating factor is involved in the regulation of osteoblast/osteoclast activity together with cathepsin and carbonic anhydrases (Martin and Udagawa 1998Go; Quinn and Gillespie 2005Go). The cDNA/gene of this protein was identified and cloned in S. domuncula. The deduced protein comprises three ankyrin domains and one SH3 (Src homology 3) domain. Both domains are involved in protein–protein interactions in those molecules involved in signal transduction and cellular localization (McPherson 1999Go). Similarity of the sponge protein is highest to the corresponding human protein; similarity scores to related proteins from protostomians are lower, e.g., to the osteoclast-stimulating factor 1 from C. elegans. Using in situ hybridization, it could be demonstrated that cell expression of the gene for OSTF_SUBDO is highest in those cells surrounding the spicules and the sclerocytes. Our immunofluorescence studies with antibodies against silicatein and silicase experimentally support the earlier hypothesis of Uriz et al. (2003)Go to some extent by implying that spiculogenesis and spicule arrangement are under tuned genetic control by the synthesizing molecules, e.g., the different forms of silicatein, as well as hormone-like factors and/or transcription factor (homeodomain proteins).

Subsequently, the question of which structural molecules in sponges allow the formation of the species-specific diverse structures was approached by immunoelectron microscopy using antibodies against silicatein and galectin. Galectins, galactose-specific lectins, are dominant proteins existing in the mesohyl of the demosponges Geodia cydonium (Diehl-Seifert et al. 1985Go; Müller et al. 1997Go) and also S. domuncula (Wiens et al. 2003Go). In the mesohyl, "unstructured" extracellular matrix or ground substances classified to the carbohydrate-rich compounds (Garrone 1978Go) are also highly abundant. As in G. cydonium, the S. domuncula galectin forms three-dimensional clumps in the presence of Ca2+ (Diehl-Seifert et al. 1985Go; Wiens et al. 2003Go). To clarify if the biosilica-forming enzyme silicatein and the structural protein galectin are colocalized in the extraspicular space of the mesohyl, immunoelectron microscopic analyses were performed. This series of experiments showed that silicatein is associated with the galectin meshwork in concentric rings around the spicules. In a recent study (Schröder et al. 2006Go), we showed that spicule formation occurs in the final steps extracellularly in the mesohyl where an appositional growth of spicules can be demonstrated. Galectin molecules associate in the presence of Ca2+ to strings (nets) that allow binding of silicatein molecules (Schröder et al. 2006Go). Subsequently, collagen fibers seem to orient the silicatein-galectin strings concentrically around the growing spicules. Finally, as reported recently by Schröder et al. (2006)Go, biosilica deposition is mediated in two directions, originating both from the silicatein-galectin strings and from the surface of the spicules (centripetal and centrifugal). Additional fibrous molecules might very likely be involved in the formation of the concentric rings as well, e.g., spongin (Wheeler and Mendel 1909Go), whose chemical composition and gene(s) are currently not defined (Simpson 1984Go), or collagen (Garrone 1978Go).

In the present study the spatial coexistence of the concentrically arranged galectin/silicatein superstructures with the collagen fibers is demonstrated. Because galectin is arranged in the mesohyl of sponge around the spicules in strings/bundles displaying no apparent organization pattern, it might be proposed that collagen serves as a major fibrillar network/matrix during the size- and form-specific mineralization of spicules (Simpson et al. 1985Go; Schröder et al. 2006Go). In the present study, organization of collagen fibrils in adult specimens was analyzed by SEM. It is documented that a collagen web surrounds the spicules in a highly organized manner. Along the longitudinal direction of the spicules the fibers are primarily arranged parallel to their surfaces. At the tips of the spicules, collagen fibers surround the knobs of the tylostyles as a mesh. It is not yet known if the slight swelling/knob of the tylostyles in S. domuncula is initially present during the synthesis of the spicules or secondarily apposed onto the spicules. In view of the available data (Schröder et al. 2006Go), the latter possibility is more realistic because oxea spicules, pointed at both ends, are seen almost exclusively in primmorphs. SEM analyses also show that a less fibrous material covers the intimate surfaces of the spicules, very likely the silicatein/galectin strings as identified by TEM. To the best of our knowledge, such a highly ordered organization of fibrils/fibers composed of galectin and collagen has not been previously reported in demosponges. This is in contrast to reports on the hexactinellid sponges, Euplectella marhalli (Ijima 1901Go) and Monorhaphis chuni (Schulze 1904Go).

Together the presented results show that during spiculogenesis the two enzymes silicatein (anabolism of biosilica) and silicase (dissolution) mediate biosilica deposition, a process that is matrix-guided primarily by galectin and secondarily also by collagen. Future experiments should address the question on the mechanism and specificity of interactions of these molecules and will try to elucidate the controlling genetic machinery switched on during spicule formation. The osteoclast-stimulating factor described here is a first step toward an understanding of the regulatory system controlling the size and shape of the spicules.


    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the European Commission, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Germany, and the International Human Frontier Science Program.

We thank Ms. E. Sehn (Zoological Institute; University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany) for valuable technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
Received for publication December 17, 2005; accepted April 24, 2006


    Literature Cited
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 

Bergquist PR (1978) Sponges. Berkeley, University of California

Boury-Esnault N, Rützler K, eds. (1997) In Thesaurus of Sponge Morphology. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, No. 596. Washington, DC, Smithsonian Institution Press

Bütschli O (1901) Einige Beobachtungen über Kiesel- und Kalknadeln von Spongien. Z Wiss Zool 64:235–286

Cha JN, Shimizu K, Zhou Y, Christianssen SC, Chmelka BF, Stucky GD, Morse DE (1999) Silicatein filaments and subunits from a marine sponge direct the polymerization of silica and silicones in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:361–365[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Danscher G (1981) Histochemical demonstration of heavy metals. A revised version of the sulphide silver method suitable for both light and electronmicroscopy. Histochemistry 71:1–16[CrossRef][Medline]

Diehl-Seifert B, Kurelec B, Zahn RK, Dorn A, Jerecevic B, Uhlenbruck G, Müller WEG (1985) Attachment of sponge cells to collagen substrata: effect of a collagen assembly factor. J Cell Sci 79:271–285[Abstract]

Garant PR (2003) Oral Cells and Tissues. Chicago, Quintessence Publishing Company

Garrone R (1978) Phylogenesis of Connective Tissue. Basel, S. Karger

Garrone R (1984) Formation and involvement of extracellular matrix in the development of sponges, a primitive multicellular system. In Trelstad RL, ed. The Role of Extracellular Matrix in Development. New York, Alan R. Liss, 461–477

Garrone R (1998) Evolution of metazoan collagens. Prog Mol Subcell Biol 21:119–139[Medline]

Hatch WI (1980) The implication of carbonic anhydrase in the physiological mechanism of penetration of carbonate substrata by the marine burrowing sponge Cliona celate (Demospongiae). Biol Bull 159:135–147[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ijima I (1901) Studies on Hexactinellida. J Coll Sci Imp Univ Tokyo 5:1–299

Kaluzhnaya OV, Belikov SI, Schröder HC, Rothenberger M, Zapf S, Kaandorp JA, Borejko A, et al. (2005) Dynamics of skeletal formation in the Lake Baikal sponge Lubomirskia baicalensis. II. Molecular biological studies. Naturwissenschaften 92:128–133[CrossRef][Medline]

Krasko A, Batel R, Schröder HC, Müller IM, Müller WEG (2000) Expression of silicatein and collagen genes in the marine sponge Suberites domuncula is controlled by silicate and myotrophin. Eur J Biochem 267:4878–4887[Medline]

Krasko A, Schröder HC, Batel R, Grebenjuk VA, Steffen R, Müller IM, et al. (2002) Iron induces proliferation and morphogenesis in primmorphs from the marine sponge Suberites domuncula. DNA Cell Biol 21:67–80[CrossRef][Medline]

Kruse M, Müller IM, Müller WEG (1997) Early evolution of metazoan serine/threonine- and tyrosine kinases: identification of selected kinases in marine sponges. Mol Biol Evol 14:1326–1334[Abstract]

Martin TJ, Udagawa N (1998) Hormonal regulation of osteoclast function. Trends Endocrinol Metab 9:6–11[Medline]

McPherson PS (1999) Regulatory role of SH3 domain-mediated protein-protein interactions in synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Cell Signal 11:229–238[CrossRef][Medline]

Minchin EA (1909) Sponge-spicules. Ergebn Fortschr Zoologie 2:171–274

Müller WEG (2005) Spatial and temporal expression patterns in animals. In Meyers RA, ed. Encyclopedia of Molecular Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, vol.13. Weinheim, Wiley-VCH GmbH, 269–309

Müller WEG, Belikov SI, Tremel W, Perry CC, Gieskes WWC, Boreiko A, Schröder HC (2006) Siliceous spicules in marine demosponges (example Suberites domuncula). Micron 37:107-120[CrossRef][Medline]

Müller WEG, Blumbach B, Wagner-Hülsmann C, Lessel U (1997) Galectins in the phylogenetically oldest Metazoa, the sponges [Porifera]. Trends Glycosci Glycotechnol 9:123–130

Müller WEG, Krasko A, Le Pennec G, Steffen R, Ammar MSA, Wiens M, Müller IM, et al. (2003) Molecular mechanism of spicule formation in the demosponge Suberites domuncula: silicatein - collagen - myotrophin. Prog Mol Subcell Biol 33:195–222[Medline]

Müller WEG, Rothenberger M, Boreiko A, Tremel W, Reiber A, Schröder HC (2005) Formation of siliceous spicules in the marine demosponge Suberites domuncula. Cell Tissue Res 321:285–297[CrossRef][Medline]

Müller WEG, Wiens M, Batel R, Steffen R, Borojevic R, Custodio RM (1999) Establishment of a primary cell culture from a sponge: primmorphs from Suberites domuncula. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 178:205–219

Perovic S, Schröder HC, Sudek S, Grebenjuk VA, Batel R, Stifanic M, Müller IM, et al. (2003) Expression of one sponge Iroquois homeobox gene in primmorphs from Suberites domuncula during canal formation. Evol Dev 5:240–250[CrossRef][Medline]

Polak JM, McGee JD (1998) In Situ Hybridization. Oxford, Oxford University Press

Quinn JMW, Gillespie MT (2005) Modulation of osteoclast formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 328:739–745[CrossRef][Medline]

Schröder HC, Boreiko A, Korzhev M, Tahir MN, Tremel W, Eckert C, Ushijima H, et al. (2006) Co-expression and functional interaction of silicatein with galectin: matrix-guided formation of siliceous spicules in the marine demosponge Suberites domuncula. J Biol Chem 281:12001–12009[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schröder HC, Krasko A, Le Pennec G, Adell T, Hassanein H, Müller IM, Müller WEG (2003) Silicase, an enzyme which degrades biogenous amorphous silica: contribution to the metabolism of silica deposition in the demosponge Suberites domuncula. Prog Mol Subcell Biol 33:249–268[Medline]

Schröder HC, Perovic-Ottstadt S, Rothenberger M, Wiens M, Schwertner H, Batel R, Korzhev M, et al. (2004a) Silica transport in the demosponge Suberites domuncula: fluorescence emission analysis using the PDMPO probe and cloning of a potential transporter. Biochem J 381:665–673[CrossRef][Medline]

Schröder HC, Perovic-Ottstadt S, Wiens M, Batel R, Müller IM, Müller WEG (2004b) Differentiation capacity of the epithelial cells in the sponge Suberites domuncula. Cell Tissue Res 316:271–280[CrossRef][Medline]

Schulze FE (1887) Report on the Hexactinellida. In Murray J, ed. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of the HMS Challenger during the Years 1873–1876, vol 21. London, Her Majesty's Stationary Office, 513

Schulze FE (1904) Hexactinellida. In Chun C. ed. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer "Valdivia" 1898–1899. Jena, Gustav Fischer

Schulze FE, v Lendenfeld R (1889) Die Bezeichnung der Spongiennadeln. Berlin, Georg Reimer

Shimizu K, Cha JH, Stucky GD, Morse DE (1998) Silicatein alpha: cathepsin L-like protein in sponge biosilica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:6234–6238[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Simpson TL, Langenbruch PF, Scalera-Liaci L (1985) The unique fibrillar matrix of the marine sponge Stelletta grubii. J Morphol 186:343–359[CrossRef]

Simpson TL (1984) The Cell Biology of Sponges. New York, Springer-Verlag

Uriz MJ, Turon X, Becerro MA (2000) Silica deposition in Demospongiae: spiculogenesis in Crambe crambe. Cell Tissue Res 301:299–309[CrossRef][Medline]

Uriz MJ, Turon X, Becerro M, Agell G (2003) Siliceous spicules and skeleton frameworks in sponges: origin, diversity, ultrastructural patterns and biological functions. Microsc Res Tech 62:279–299[CrossRef][Medline]

Weaver JC, Morse DE (2003) Molecular biology of demosponge axial filaments and their role in biosilicification. Microsc Res Tech 62:356–367[CrossRef][Medline]

Weiner S, Dove PM (2003) An overview of biomineralization processes and the problem of the vital effect. Rev Mineral Geochem 54:1–29[Free Full Text]

Weissenfels N (1989) Biologie und Mikroskopische Anatomie der Süßwasserschwämme (Spongillidae). Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer Verlag

Wheeler HL, Mendel LB (1909) The iodine complex in sponges (3,5-diiodtyrosine). J Biol Chem 7:1–9[Free Full Text]

Wiens M, Belikov SI, Kaluzhnaya OV, Schröder HC, Perovic-Ottstadt S, Borejko A, Krasko A, et al. (2006) Axial (apical-basal) expression of pro-apoptotic and pro-survival genes in the Lake Baikal demosponge Lubomirskia baicalensis. DNA Cell Biol 25:152–164[CrossRef][Medline]

Wiens M, Mangoni A, D'Esposito M, Fattorusso E, Korchagina N, Schröder HC, Grebenjuk VA, et al. (2003) The molecular basis for the evolution of the metazoan bodyplan: extracellular matrix-mediated morphogenesis in marine demosponges. J Mol Evol 57:1–16[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W. E. G. Muller, A. Boreiko, U. Schlossmacher, X. Wang, C. Eckert, K. Kropf, J. Li, and H. C. Schroder
Identification of a silicatein(-related) protease in the giant spicules of the deep-sea hexactinellid Monorhaphis chuni
J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 300 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jhc.5A6903.2006v1
54/9/1031    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckert, C.
Right arrow Articles by Müller, W. E.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eckert, C.
Right arrow Articles by Müller, W. E.G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact