Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
Originally published as JHC exPRESS on May 28, 2007.
doi:10.1369/jhc.7A7222.2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jhc.7A7222.2007v1
55/9/975    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frederiks, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Van Noorden, C. J.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frederiks, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Van Noorden, C. J.F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
Volume 55 (9): 975-980, 2007
Copyright ©The Histochemical Society, Inc.

NADPH Production by the Pentose Phosphate Pathway in the Zona Fasciculata of Rat Adrenal Gland

Wilma M. Frederiks, Intan P.E.D. Kümmerlin, Klazina S. Bosch, Heleen Vreeling-Sindelárová, Ard Jonker and Cornelis J.F. Van Noorden

Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: Prof. Dr. C.J.F. Van Noorden, Department of Cell Biology & Histology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: c.j.vannoorden{at}amc.uva.nl


    Summary
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
Biosynthesis of steroid hormones in the cortex of the adrenal gland takes place in smooth endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria and requires NADPH. Four enzymes produce NADPH: glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), the key regulatory enzyme of the pentose phosphate pathway, phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (PGD), the third enzyme of that pathway, malate dehydrogenase (MDH), and isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICDH). However, the contribution of each enzyme to NADPH production in the cortex of adrenal gland has not been established. Therefore, activity of G6PD, PGD, MDH, and ICDH was localized and quantified in rat adrenocortical tissue using metabolic mapping, image analysis, and electron microscopy. The four enzymes have similar localization patterns in adrenal gland with highest activities in the zona fasciculata of the cortex. G6PD activity was strongest, PGD, MDH, and ICDH activity was ~60%, 15%, and 7% of G6PD activity, respectively. The Km value of G6PD for glucose-6-phosphate was two times higher than the Km value of PGD for phosphogluconate. As a consequence, virtual flux rates through G6PD and PGD are largely similar. It is concluded that G6PD and PGD provide the major part of NADPH in adrenocortical cells. Their activity is localized in the cytoplasm associated with free ribosomes and membranes of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum, indicating that NADPH-demanding processes related to biosynthesis of steroid hormones take place at these sites. Complete inhibition of G6PD by androsterones suggests that there is feedback regulation of steroid hormone biosynthesis via G6PD. (J Histochem Cytochem 55:975–980, 2007)

Key Words: NADPH • adrenal gland • glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase • phosphogluconate dehydrogenase


    Introduction
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
GLUCOSE-6-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE (G6PD; EC 1.1.1.49) is the key regulatory enzyme of the pentose phosphate pathway. It produces ribose that is incorporated in nucleotides and nucleic acids, and NADPH, the major cytoplasmic reducing compound (Kletzien et al. 1994Go). NADPH is involved in fatty acid oxidation and lipid and steroid biosynthesis. It is a substrate for NADPH oxidases in activated macrophages (Spolarics and Wu 1997Go) and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (Borregaard et al. 1984Go) to produce oxygen radicals. It is necessary for reduction of oxidized glutathione by glutathione reductase (Romero et al. 1991Go; Ninfali et al. 1996Go). Finally, it is a substrate for biotransformation and detoxification enzymes (Winzer et al. 2001Go). G6PD activity is elevated in response to external stimuli (hormones, growth factors, nutrients, and toxic and oxidative stress) (Swezey and Epel 1986Go; Stanton et al. 1991Go; Kletzien et al. 1994Go; Jonges et al. 1995Go; Spolarics 1998Go; Amir-Ahmady and Salati 2001Go).

High G6PD activity has been found in adrenocortical cells of the adrenal gland (Rudolph and Klein 1964Go; Okano et al. 1965Go). High activity is related to NADPH production for the biosynthesis of steroids. This is also based on the localization of G6PD activity in the hyaloplasm associated with membranes of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER) where a number of steps of the steroid hormone biosynthesis take place in these cells (Bara 1979Go; Berchtold 1979Go; Ishibashi et al. 1999Go). However, other enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of steroid hormones are localized in mitochondria (Bara 1979Go; Berchtold 1979Go; Ishimura and Fujita 1997Go).

Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) has been shown to stimulate G6PD activity in rat adrenocortical cells (McKerns 1964Go; Criss and McKerns 1968aGo), whereas steroids inhibit G6PD activity in the adrenal cortex (Criss and McKerns 1968bGo).

So far, the contribution to NADPH production by phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (PGD), the third enzyme of the pentose phosphate pathway, and the two other NADPH-producing enzymes, malate dehydrogenase (MDH) and isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICDH), in adrenocortical cells is not known. Therefore, in the present study we investigated the kinetic properties of G6PD, PGD, MDH, and ICDH in rat adrenal gland with in situ techniques and image analysis. Effects of androsterone, an inhibitor of G6PD activity in a number of cell types (Shantz et al. 1989Go; Gordon et al. 1995Go), on G6PD activity in adrenal gland were studied as well. Moreover, G6PD and PGD activity was localized ultrastructurally using the ferricyanide method according to Frederiks and Vreeling-Sindelárová (2001)Go.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
Tissue Preparation
Adrenal glands were obtained from five male Wistar rats weighing 325–350 g after sacrifice by an overdose of phenobarbital or an incision in the vena cava. Principles of laboratory animal care were followed and, according to Dutch law, the Animal Welfare Committee of the Academic Medical Center approved the study. The adrenals were immediately embedded in 7% (w/v) gelatin in distilled water, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80C up to maximally 1 week until used. Eight-µm-thick cryostat sections were cut at –25C on a motor-driven Bright cryostat (Huntington, UK) fitted with a rotary retracting microtome, picked up on glass slides, and stored at –25C until used (Van Noorden and Frederiks 1992Go).

Cell Isolation Procedure
To obtain a suspension of adrenal gland cells, the capsule of the adrenal gland was mechanically removed. Adrenal glands were then dissected into small pieces using scissors. Tissue fragments were incubated in a solution of 2 mg collagenase (Sigma; St Louis, MO) in 5 ml 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, for 60 min at 37C. Cells were spun down by centrifugation for 5 min at 1000 x g at 4C, washed three times, and taken up in 0.5 ml 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4.

Demonstration of G6PD, PGD, MDH, and ICDH Activity
Cryostat sections of adrenal gland were allowed to dry at room temperature for 5 min and were then incubated for the demonstration of G6PD, PGD, MDH, and ICDH activity according to Van Noorden and Frederiks (1992)Go. Incubation medium contained 18% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, average molecular mass 70,000–100,000; Sigma) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 0.32 mM 1-methoxyphenazine methosulfate (Serva; Heidelberg, Germany), 5 mM sodium azide, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM nitro BT (Sigma), and the respective substrate. For G6PD, PGD, MDH, and ICDH, the following substrate concentrations were used: 10 mM glucose-6-phosphate (G6P; Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany), 10 mM 6-phosphogluconate (PG; Boehringer), 100 mM L-malate (Serva), and 20 mM DL-isocitrate (Sigma), respectively. The media were freshly prepared just before incubation and nitro BT was added after being dissolved in a heated mixture of dimethylformamide and ethanol (final dilution of each solvent in the medium was 2% v/v). For the demonstration of G6PD, PGD, MDH, and ICDH activity, sections were incubated for 5 min, 5 min, 30 min, and 30 min at room temperature, respectively. Sections were then rinsed with hot phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.3, 65C) to remove the incubation medium and to immediately stop the reaction. It is essential to rinse in phosphate buffer, pH 5.3, at 65C to stop the reaction because G6PD shows activity at temperatures up to 60C, whereas it is scarcely present at pH 5.3 (Corpas et al. 1995Go). Afterwards, sections were embedded in glycerol jelly. Control reactions were performed in the absence of substrate and NADP+ for G6PD, MDH, and ICDH and in the absence of PG for PGD (Butcher and Van Noorden 1985Go). To test whether PGD activity was involved in the assay for the demonstration of G6PD activity, sections were incubated in the presence of both 10 mM G6P and 10 mM PG. The test minus control reaction of the latter assay was diminished with the test minus control reaction of PGD and was taken as a measure for the actual G6PD activity (Lawrence et al. 1988Go), showing that PGD activity was not involved in the assay of G6PD activity.

To investigate the possible involvement of hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (H6PD) in the assay of G6PD activity, 10 mM galactose-6-phosphate (Boehringer) was used as a substrate instead of G6P (Kidder 1983Go).

Effects of different inhibitors on G6PD activity were tested by incubating in the presence of 10 mM epiandrosterone (Sigma), dehydroepiandrosterone (Sigma), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (Sigma), all dissolved in dimethylformamide and 10 mM N-ethylmaleimide (Sigma) dissolved in ethanol. Vmax and Km values toward G6P and PG of G6PD and PGD, respectively, were determined by incubating sections in the presence of various concentrations of G6P or PG in the range of 0–10 mM, respectively (Jonges et al. 1995Go; Van Noorden et al. 1997Go).

Ultrastructural Localization of G6PD and PGD Activity in Isolated Cells
Cells isolated from adrenal gland were incubated for the ultrastructural localization of G6PD and PGD activity as previously described for liver parenchymal cells (Frederiks and Vreeling-Sindelárová 2001Go). It has been previously shown that unfixed cryostat sections can be used to demonstrate the activity of various types of enzymes (Schellens et al. 2003Go) but not that of oxidoreductases, including dehydrogenases. However, the activity of G6PD (Frederiks and Vreeling-Sindelárová 2001Go), xanthine oxidoreductase (Frederiks and Vreeling-Sindelárová 2002Go), and lactate dehydrogenase (Schellens et al. 2003Go) was localized ultrastructurally in isolated cells. Therefore, we decided to use isolated cells instead of cryostat sections of adrenal gland to demonstrate G6PD and PGD activity at the ultrastructural level. To protect G6PD and PGD activity in isolated cells against the permeabilization procedure, pelleted cells were incubated in 0.5 ml of a solution of 20 mM NADP+ (Boehringer) in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, for 10 min at 4C. After centrifugation at 1000 x g, 4C, for 5 min, cells were permeabilized by adding 5 ml of a solution containing 0.025% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (Merck) in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. Permeabilization was performed for 30 min at room temperature under continuous rotation of the tubes. The procedure was stopped by washing the cells three times for 1 min with 3 ml 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, at 4C, followed by rapid centrifugation at 1000 x g. Cells were resuspended in 0.5 ml of the same buffer. Cell suspensions (0.1 ml) were added to the histochemical media (1 ml) for demonstration of G6PD or PGD activity. Incubation was carried out for 15 min at room temperature under continuous rotation. Incubation medium contained 6% PVA in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 10 mM G6P or PG, 0.8 mM NADP+, 0.32 mM 1-methoxyphenazine methosulfate, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM sodium azide, 10 mM potassium ferricyanide, 30 mM sodium citrate, and 30 mM cupric sulfate. Control reactions were performed by omitting the substrate and NADP+ from the incubation medium. After incubation, the reaction was stopped by adding 5 ml 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, at 4C. Cells were washed three times with the same buffer, spun down rapidly at 1000 x g, and finally resuspended in 1 ml buffer. For light microscopic inspection, 10 µl of the suspended cells was placed on glass slides. The suspension was air dried for 30 min at 37C and mounted in glycerol jelly. For electron microscopy, incubated cells were mixed with fixative containing 1% (w/v) glutaraldehyde and 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in 100 mM cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, and fixation lasted for 60 min at 4C. Fixation was followed by centrifugation at 1000 x g at 4C. Cells were rinsed in 100 mM cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, for 30 min, postfixed in 1% OsO4 (Drijfhout; Amsterdam, The Netherlands) in 100 mM cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, for 60 min at 4C or with 1% OsO4 and 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide in 100 mM phosphate buffer for 2 hr at 4C and thoroughly rinsed with bidistilled water. Afterwards, samples were dehydrated and embedded in epoxy resin LX-112 (Ladd; Burlington, VT) according to standard procedures. Ultrathin sections (50- to 70-nm thick) were cut on an LKB Ultratome III ultramicrotome and studied with an EM-10c transmission electron microscope (Zeiss; Oberkochen, Germany).

Image Analysis
Formazan in adrenocortical cells of rat adrenal gland was measured by image analysis according to Chieco et al. (1994)Go using a Vanox-T photomicroscope (Olympus; Tokyo, Japan) with a x2 objective (numerical aperture 0.08). Experiments were performed in triplicate, and two preparations were incubated per experiment. Sections were illuminated with white light from a stabilized power supply after filtering by infrared blocking filters (Jonker et al. 1997Go) and a monochromatic filter of the isobestic wavelength of nitro BT formazan (585 nm) (Van Noorden and Frederiks 1992Go). Images of the sections were captured using a CCD camera that was attached to a frame grabber (Scion image 1.59 for Mac; Scion, Frederick, MD) and a computer (8100; Apple Macintosh, Cupertino CA). Gray values were converted to absorbance values by using a set of neutral density filters (Jonker et al. 1997Go). Absorbance values were converted into amounts (micromoles) of substrate converted per minute per area (Van Noorden and Frederiks 1992Go). Absorbance values of control reactions were subtracted from test values to obtain specific activity (Butcher and Van Noorden 1985Go). Measurements were performed in the zona fasciculata of the cortex.

Statistics
Statistical processing of data was performed using Excel 97 (Microsoft; San Jose, CA) and SPSS 8.0 for Windows (SPSS; Chicago IL). Vmax and Km values were expressed as mean values ± SD. A paired Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis; differences were tested at the 0.05 level of significance. Vmax and Km values were calculated from plots of substrate concentrations vs the ratio of substrate concentrations and reaction velocity according to Wilkinson (1961)Go. Regression analysis of these plots was performed when appropriate.

Flux rates ({Phi}) of G6PD and PGD with their respective substrates were calculated using the formula:

Formula 1(1)
with an assumed physiological substrate concentration of 0.1 mM (Teutsch 1981Go).


    Results
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
Localization of NADPH-producing Enzymes
G6PD, PGD, MDH, and ICDH activity in serial sections of adrenal gland showed similar distribution patterns. Enzyme activities were highest in cells of the zona fasciculata of the cortex of adrenal gland. A somewhat lower activity was found in cells of the zona glomerulosa and zona reticularis, whereas activities were scarcely present in cells of the medulla and the capsule of the gland (Figure 1 ). Only small amounts of final reaction product were formed in cortical cells of the gland after incubation in the absence of substrate and coenzyme.


Figure 1
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1

Light microscopy of cryostat sections of rat adrenal gland incubated for the demonstration of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity (A) and phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (PDG) activity (B). High G6PD and PGD activity is present in cells of the zona fasciculata (f) of the cortex with lower activity in cells of the zona reticularis (r), whereas activity is scarcely present in cells of the zona glomerulosa (g), most cells of the medulla (m), and the capsule of the adrenal gland. Bar = 100 µm.

 
To exclude the involvement of H6PD in the detection of G6PD activity, the incubation was performed in the presence of galactose-6-P instead of G6P. The amounts of final reaction product formed in the presence of galactose-6-P were similar to the amounts produced in the absence of substrate (data not shown). This suggests that H6PD was not interfering in the G6PD reaction.

Quantification of G6PD, PGD, MDH, and ICDH Activity
Epiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone inhibited G6PD activity almost completely in the adrenal cortex (90% and 95%, respectively). Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate inhibited G6PD activity by only 30%, possibly due to the poor solubility of this inhibitor in aqueous media. N-ethylmaleimide, a compound that blocks SH groups in molecules, did not affect G6PD activity, which means that SH groups were not relevant in G6PD activity in rat adrenal gland (data not shown).

Table 1 demonstrates that G6PD showed the highest activity in the zona fasciculata of adrenal glands. PGD was approximately half the G6PD activity, whereas the relative contribution of MDH and ICDH to NADPH synthesis was only 15% and 7%, respectively. Determination of Vmax and Km values of G6PD and PGD in the zona fasciculata showed that G6PD activity was ~75% higher than PGD activity, whereas the Km value of G6PD for G6P was approximately two times higher than the Km value of PGD for PG (Table 2 ). As a consequence, imaginary fluxes calculated at an assumed physiological substrate concentration of 0.1 mM (Teutsch 1981Go) were largely similar through both enzymes. Metabolic fluxes are considered to be direct parameters of metabolic activity (Newsholme et al. 1980Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1

Activities of G6PD, PGD, MDH, and ICDH in the zona fasciculata of rat adrenal gland as determined quantitatively with the use of image analysis in cryostat sections

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2

Vmax and Km values and imaginary fluxes ({Phi}) of G6PD and PGD in the zona fasciculata of rat adrenal gland as determined quantitatively with the use of image analysis in cryostat sections

 
Ultrastructural Localization of G6PD and PGD Activity
Suspensions of cells from adrenal glands were incubated for the demonstration of G6PD and PGD activity with the ferricyanide method. At the electron microscopic level, cells were observed with lipid droplets, extensive networks of SER, and spherical mitochondria with tubular cristae typical for adrenocortical cells. These cells contained varying amounts of electron-dense precipitate, likely dependent on their localization in the cortex of the adrenal glands. Cells with the highest amounts of electron-dense precipitate were carefully studied. Electron-dense reaction product due to G6PD activity was present in the cytoplasm associated with membranes of SER and free ribosomes (Figure 2 ). Nuclei always contained some precipitate, but this was considered to be nonspecific because it was also observed after control incubations. Final reaction product was not observed after incubation in the absence of G6P and NADP+, except for nuclei. A similar distribution pattern of electron-dense reaction product was observed when cells were incubated for the demonstration of PGD activity (Figure 2D).


Figure 2
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2

Electron micrographs of isolated cells of adrenal gland. (A) Cell immediately fixed with OsO4 in the presence of potassium ferrocyanide without any preceding enzyme incubation. (B,C) Cells incubated for the demonstration of G6PD activity with the ferricyanide method postfixed with either OsO4 and potassium ferrocyanide (B), or OsO4 only (C). (D) Cell incubated for the demonstration of PDG activity and postfixed with OsO4 only. Cells are characterized by the presence of spherical mitochondria with tubular cristae (m), lipid droplets (l), and membranes of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (arrow) and free ribosomes (arrowhead) in between the mitochondria (A). Electron-dense reaction product is present in between the mitochondria, possibly associated with membranes of smooth endoplasmic reticulum and free ribosomes (arrows in B–D). Bar = 0.25 µm.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 
The present study shows that four NADPH-producing enzymes (G6PD, PGD, MDH, and ICDH) have similar localization patterns in adrenal gland. Highest activities were found in the zona fasciculata in the cortex where glucocorticoids are synthesized, whereas medulla showed scarcely any activity of these enzymes (Figure 1). The two NADPH-producing enzymes of the phosphate pathway, G6PD and PGD, produce ~85% of the total pool of NADPH. Both enzymes can produce roughly the same amount of NADPH at physiological substrate concentrations (Table 2). Therefore, it can be concluded that the pentose phosphate pathway is the major provider of NADPH for glucocorticoid synthesis in the zona fasciculata.

Steroids produced in the zona fasciculata are mainly glucocorticoids, whereas zona glomerulosa and zona reticularis synthesize and secrete mineralocorticoids and androgens, respectively. In the present study we have shown that DHEA is a strong inhibitor of G6PD activity, whereas ACTH has been demonstrated to stimulate G6PD activity in the cortex (McKerns 1964Go; Criss and McKerns 1968aGo). This suggests that the demand for NADPH and indirectly for hormones produced by the cortex of the adrenal gland may be regulated by ACTH and DHEA via G6PD activity.

In the present study we also demonstrated that G6PD activity was localized in the cytoplasm, associated with SER and free ribosomes (Figure 2). This is in accordance with previous findings in adrenal gland (Berchtold 1979Go; Ishibashi et al. 1999Go), testis (Bara 1979Go), and intestine (Ninfali et al. 2001Go). As far as we know, this is the first study on the ultrastructural localization of PGD activity. The finding that G6PD and PGD activity have a similar distribution pattern in adrenocortical cells is not surprising. NADPH produced by G6PD and PGD at SER is used for the synthesis of sterols as a precursor for steroid hormones from acetyl CoA. Many enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of steroid hormones are localized at membranes of SER (Berchtold 1977Go; Bara 1979Go; Balasubramaniam et al. 1981Go; Ishimura and Fujita 1997Go), although certain enzymes are found at inner membranes of mitochondria (Berchtold 1977Go; Ishimura and Fujita 1997Go). These findings suggest that NADPH-demanding processes related with biosynthesis of steroid hormones occur at membranes of SER, whereas NADPH produced at free ribosomes is used for other purposes.

N-ethylmaleimide, a blocker of SH groups, was shown to affect G6PD activity in rat liver (De Jong et al. 2001Go; Frederiks et al. 2007Go) but did not inhibit G6PD activity in adrenal gland. We have previously shown that it is mainly G6PD in peroxisomes in rat liver parenchymal cells that is dependent on SH groups (Frederiks et al. 2007Go). In the present study, we have demonstrated that G6PD activity was localized at free ribosomes and membranes of SER but not in peroxisomes. Absence of G6PD in peroxisomes in adrenocortical cells may therefore explain the insensitivity of G6PD activity for inhibition by N-ethylmaleimide.

In conclusion, both G6PD and PGD, but not MDH and ICDH, have a high capacity to produce NADPH in SER for steroid biosynthesis in adrenocortical cells. This pathway is regulated by androsterones via G6PD.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Mr. A. Maas and Mr. G. van Woerkom for obtaining adrenal glands, Mr. J. Peeterse and Mr. C. Gravemeijer for photographic work, and Mrs. T.M.S. Pierik for preparation of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
Received for publication February 28, 2007; accepted May 14, 2007


    Literature Cited
 Top
 Summary
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Literature Cited
 

Amir-Ahmady B, Salati LM (2001) Regulation of the processing of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA by nutritional status. J Biol Chem 276:10514–10523[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Balasubramaniam S, Mitropoulos KA, Venkatesan S, Myant NB, Peters TJ, Postiglione A, Mancini M (1981) Analytical fractionation of human liver microsomal fractions: localization of cholesterol and of the enzymes relevant to its metabolism. Clin Sci 60:435–439[Medline]

Bara G (1979) The ultrastructural localization of the enzymes related to steroid hormone metabolism in the guinea-pig testis. Histochem J 11:51–71[CrossRef][Medline]

Berchtold JP (1977) Ultracytochemical demonstration and probable localization of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity with a ferricyanide technique. Histochemistry 50:175–190[CrossRef][Medline]

Berchtold JP (1979) Ultrastructural demonstration of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in steroid-secreting cells. Histochemistry 63:173–180[CrossRef][Medline]

Borregaard N, Schwartz JH, Tauber AI (1984) Proton secretion by stimulated neutrophils. Significance of hexose monophosphate shunt activity as source of electrons and protons for the respiratory burst. J Clin Invest 74:455–459[Medline]

Butcher RG, Van Noorden CJF (1985) Reaction rate studies of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in sections of rat liver using four tetrazolium salts. Histochem J 17:993–1008[CrossRef][Medline]

Chieco P, Jonker A, Melchiorri C, Vanni G, Van Noorden CJF (1994) A user's guide for avoiding errors in absorbance image cytometry: a review with original experimental observations. Histochem J 26:1–19[Medline]

Corpas FJ, Garcia-Salguero L, Peragon J, Lupianez JA (1995) Kinetic properties of hexose-monophosphate dehydrogenase. I. Isolation and partial purification of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from rat liver and kidney cortex. Life Sci 56:179–189[CrossRef][Medline]

Criss WE, McKerns KW (1968a) Activation of cow adrenal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase by adrenocorticotropin. Biochemistry 7:2364–2368[CrossRef][Medline]

Criss WE, McKerns KW (1968b) Purification and partial characterization of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from cow adrenal cortex. Biochemistry 7:125–134[CrossRef][Medline]

De Jong JSSG, Frederiks WM, Van Noorden CJF (2001) Oxygen insensitivity of the histochemical assay of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity for the detection of (pre)neoplasm in rat liver. J Histochem Cytochem 49:565–571[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Frederiks WM, Vreeling-Sindelárová H (2001) Localization of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity on ribosomes of granular endoplasmic reticulum, in peroxisomes and peripheral cytoplasm of rat liver parenchymal cells. Histochem J 33:345–353[CrossRef][Medline]

Frederiks WM, Vreeling-Sindelárová H (2002) Ultrastructural localization of xanthine oxidoreductase activity in isolated rat liver cells. Acta Histochem 104:29–37[CrossRef][Medline]

Frederiks WM, Vreeling-Sindelárová H, Van Noorden CJF (2007) Loss of peroxisomes causes oxygen insensitivity of the histochemical assay of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity to detect cancer cells. J Histochem Cytochem 55:175–181[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gordon G, Mackow MC, Levy HR (1995) On the mechanism of interaction of steroids with human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Arch Biochem Biophys 318:25–29[CrossRef][Medline]

Ishibashi T, Takizawa T, Iwasaki H, Saito T, Matsubara S, Nakazawa E, Kanazawa K (1999) Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase cytochemistry using a copper ferrocyanide method and its application to rapidly frozen cells. Histochem Cell Biol 112:221–232[CrossRef][Medline]

Ishimura K, Fujita H (1997) Light and electron microscopic immunohistochemistry of the localization of adrenal steroidogenic enzymes. Microsc Res Tech 36:445–453[CrossRef][Medline]

Jonges GN, Vogels IMC, Van Noorden CJF (1995) Effects of partial hepatectomy, phenobarbital and 3-methylcholanthrene on kinetic parameters of glucose-6-phosphate and phosphogluconate dehydrogenase in situ in periportal, intermediate and pericentral zones of rat liver lobules. Biochim Biophys Acta 124:59–64

Jonker A, Geerts WJC, Chieco P, Moorman AFM, Lamers WH, Van Noorden CJF (1997) Basic strategies for valid cytometry using image analysis. Histochem J 29:347–364[CrossRef][Medline]

Kidder GM (1983) Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase isozymes in fish—a comparative study. J Exp Zool 226:385–390[CrossRef][Medline]

Kletzien RF, Harris PK, Foellmi LA (1994) Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: a "housekeeping" enzyme subject to tissue-specific regulation by hormones, nutrients, and oxidant stress. FASEB J 8:174–181[Abstract]

Lawrence GM, Beesley ACH, Matthews JB (1988) The use of continuous monitoring to assess the effect of endogenous 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase on the histochemical quantitation of hexokinase activity. Proc R Microsc Soc 23:318

McKerns KW (1964) Mechanism of action of adrenocorticotropic hormone through activation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Biochim Biophys Acta 90:357–371[Medline]

Newsholme EA, Crabtree B, Zammitt VA (1980) Use of enzyme activities as indices of maximum rates of fuel utilization. In Evered D, O'Connor M, eds. Trends in Enzyme Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 245–258

Ninfali P, Cuppini C, Marinoni S (1996) Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and glutathione reductase support antioxidant enzymes in nerves and muscles of rats during nerve regeneration. Restor Neurol Neurosci 10:69–75

Ninfali P, Malatesta M, Biagiotti E, Aluigi G, Gazzanelli G (2001) Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in small intestine of rabbit: biochemical properties and subcellular localization. Acta Histochem 103:287–303[CrossRef][Medline]

Okano K, Matsumoto K, Koizumi T, Mizushima T, Mori M (1965) Histochemical comparison of oxidative enzymes in adrenal glands of mammals. Histochemie 4:494–501[Medline]

Romero FJ, Monsalve E, Hermenegildo C, Puertas FJ, Higueras V, Nies E, Segura-Aguilar J, et al. (1991) Oxygen toxicity in the nervous tissue: comparison of the antioxidant defense of rat brain and sciatic nerve. Neurochem Res 16:157–161[CrossRef][Medline]

Rudolph G, Klein HJ (1964) Histochemische Darstellung und Verteilung der Glukose-6-Phosphat-Dehydrogenase in normalen Rattenorganen. Histochemie 4:238–251[CrossRef][Medline]

Schellens JPM, Vreeling-Sindelárová H, Frederiks WM (2003) Electron microscopical enzyme histochemistry on unfixed tissues and cells. Bridging the gap between LM and EM enzyme histochemistry. Acta Histochem 105:1–19[CrossRef][Medline]

Shantz LM, Talalay P, Gordon GB (1989) Mechanism of inhibition of growth of 3T3–L1 fibroblasts and their differentiation to adipocytes by dehydroepiandrosterone and related steroids: role of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Med Sci (Paris) 86:3852–3856

Spolarics Z (1998) Endotoxemia, pentose cycle, and the oxidant/antioxidant balance in the hepatic sinusoid. J Leukoc Biol 63:534–541[Abstract]

Spolarics Z, Wu JX (1997) Role of glutathione and catalase in H2O2 detoxification in LPS-activated hepatic endothelial and Kupffer cells. Am J Physiol 273:G1304–1311[Medline]

Stanton RC, Seifter JL, Boxer DC, Zimmerman E, Cantley LC (1991) Rapid release of bound glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase by growth factors. Correlation with increased enzymatic activity. J Biol Chem 266:12442–12448[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Swezey RR, Epel D (1986) Regulation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in sea urchin eggs by reversible association with cell structural elements. J Cell Biol 103:1509–1515[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Teutsch HF (1981) Chemomorphology of liver parenchyma. Qualitative histochemical distribution patterns and quantitative sinusoidal profiles of G6Pase, G6PDH and malic enzyme activity and of glycogen content. Prog Histochem Cytochem 14:1–92[Medline]

Van Noorden CJF, Bahns S, Koehler A (1997) Adaptational changes in kinetic parameters of G6PDH but not of PGDH during contamination-induced carcinogenesis in livers of North Sea flatfish. Biochim Biophys Acta 1342:141–148[CrossRef][Medline]

Van Noorden CJF, Frederiks WM (1992) Enzyme Histochemistry. A Laboratory Manual of Current Methods. Oxford, UK, Bios Scientific Publishers

Wilkinson GN (1961) Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. Biochem J 80:324–332[Medline]

Winzer K, Becker W, Van Noorden CJF, Koehler A (2001) Quantitative cytochemical analysis of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in living isolated hepatocytes of European flounder for rapid analysis of xenobiotic effects. J Histochem Cytochem 49:1025–1032[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
Y. Peng, C. Zhong, W. Huang, and J. Ding
Structural studies of Saccharomyces cerevesiae mitochondrial NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase in different enzymatic states reveal substantial conformational changes during the catalytic reaction
Protein Sci., September 1, 2008; 17(9): 1542 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. B. Dammer and M. B. Sewer
Phosphorylation of CtBP1 by cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase Modulates Induction of CYP17 by Stimulating Partnering of CtBP1 and 2
J. Biol. Chem., March 14, 2008; 283(11): 6925 - 6934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jhc.7A7222.2007v1
55/9/975    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frederiks, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Van Noorden, C. J.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frederiks, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Van Noorden, C. J.F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact