|
|
||
 |
|||
|
|||
Originally published as JHC exPRESS on March 3, 2008.
doi:10.1369/jhc.2008.950527
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume 56 (6): 561-567, 2008
Copyright ©The Histochemical Society, Inc.
Matrix Mineralization as a Trigger for Osteocyte Maturation
Division of Anatomy, Department of Oral Growth and Development, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido School of Dentistry, Hokkaido, Japan (KI,YS,TS,TY), and Division of Anatomy and Cell Biology of the Hard Tissue, Department of Tissue Regeneration and Reconstruction, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (SE)
Correspondence to: Kazuharu Irie, DDS, PhD, Division of Anatomy, Department of Oral Growth and Development, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido School of Dentistry, 1757 Kanazawa, Ishikari-Tobetsu, Hokkaido 061-0293, Japan. E-mail: irie{at}hoku-iryo-u.ac.jp
 |
Summary |
|---|
 Top Summary IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
The morphology of the osteocyte changes during the cell's lifetime. Shortly after becoming buried in the matrix, an osteocyte is plump with a rich rough endoplasmic reticulum and a well-developed Golgi complex. This "immature" osteocyte reduces its number of organelles to become a "mature" osteocyte when it comes to reside deeper in the bone matrix. We hypothesized that mineralization of the surrounding matrix is the trigger for osteocyte maturation. To verify this, we prevented mineralization of newly formed matrix by administration of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (HEBP) and then examined the morphological changes in the osteocytes in rats. In the HEBP group, matrix mineralization was disturbed, but matrix formation was not affected. The osteocytes found in the unmineralized matrix were immature. Mature osteocytes were seen in the corresponding mineralized matrix in the control group. The immature osteocytes in the unmineralized matrix failed to show immunoreactivity with anti-sclerostin antibody, whereas mature osteocytes in the mineralized matrix showed immunoreactivity in both control and HEBP groups. These findings suggest that mineralization of the matrix surrounding the osteocyte is the trigger for cytodifferentiation from a plump immature form to a mature osteocyte. The osteocyte appears to start secreting sclerostin only after it matures in the mineralized bone matrix. (J Histochem Cytochem 56:561–567, 2008)
Key Words: mineralization • bisphosphonate • osteocyte • bone matrix • sclerostin/SOST
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopSummaryIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
OF THE THREE TYPES of bone cells, osteocytes, the most abundant cells in bone tissue, have the widest interface with the bone matrix. They connect with each other and with cells on the bone surface via cytoplasmic processes through bone canalicules to form a cellular network in the bone matrix (Nijweide et al. 2002
). Because this network is thought to sense and respond to not only mechanical but also systemic stimuli, the importance of osteocytes in regulating bone remodeling and turnover has been generally acknowledged. However, the precise mechanisms by which osteocytes control the function of osteoblasts and osteoclasts have just started to be revealed (Bellido 2006).
Sclerostin is the product of the SOST gene and is reported to be a negative regulator of osteoblastic bone formation (Winkler et al. 2003; van Bezooijen et al. 2005,2007). Loss of sclerostin in humans causes sclerosteosis and Van Buchem disease, both of which are characterized by a progressively sclerosing bone dysplasia with increased bone formation (Balemans et al. 2001; Brunkow et al. 2001). Recently, it was reported that the cell mainly responsible for secreting sclerostin in bone tissue is the osteocyte. Relationships between matrix mineralization and the expression of sclerostin in osteocytes have been suggested (van Bezooijen et al. 2004; Poole et al. 2005).
A newly buried osteocyte has morphological features similar to those of an osteoblast on the bone surface, such as a rich rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER) and a well-developed Golgi complex. These "young" osteocytes seen near the bone surface or in osteoid are also referred to as formative, osteoblastic, or osteoid osteocytes. After a certain period of time, the osteocyte comes to reside in the mineralized bone matrix at a distance from the bone surface. Such an osteocyte is characterized by fewer cytoplasmic organelles and a thin cell body, and is called a "mature" osteocyte (Jande and Belanger 1973; Irie et al. 2000). The majority of osteocytes seen in the bone matrix are of this type. In light of the recent evidence on sclerostin expression, this classic morphological evidence points to the cooperative occurrence of morphological and functional changes in osteocytes. However, the mechanism by which immature osteocytes mature is obscure. We hypothesized that mineralization of the surrounding matrix is the trigger for osteocyte maturation. To verify this, we used bisphosphonates to prevent bone matrix mineralization. Bisphosphonates are a group of synthetic compounds characterized by P-C-P bonds, and they have a structural similarity to pyrophosphate. They bind to the apatite crystals of hard tissues to inhibit the precipitation, growth, and dissolution of the mineral phase (Fleisch and Russell 1972; Fleisch 1981), and they also inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption. One of them, 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (HEBP), is well known for its inhibitory effect on mineralization (Schenk et al. 1973). Therefore, to investigate the effect of matrix mineralization on maturation of the osteocyte, we prevented mineralization of the bone matrix by administration of HEBP and examined the morphological and functional changes in osteocytes. The results suggest the importance of matrix mineralization surrounding the osteocytes as a trigger of their morphological and functional changes.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopSummaryIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
All protocols for the current animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics and Research Committee, and the study was conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Health Sciences University of Hokkaido.
Four-week-old male Wistar rats were used for the experiment. Rats in the experimental group were subjected for 5 days to daily dorsal subcutaneous injections of HEBP (Sumitomo Pharmaceutical Co.; Osaka, Japan) at 40 mg/kg body weight (HEBP group). Rats of the same age were subcutaneously injected with the same volume of normal saline solution and served as controls (control group). Six hr after the final injections of HEBP or normal saline solution, each animal was fixed by perfusion through the ascending aorta via the left ventricle with either 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) or a mixture of 2% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde 0.05% calcium chloride in 0.08 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). The mandibles were dissected and further fixed by immersion in the same fixative overnight at 4C.
Calcein Labeling
For chronological labeling, calcein (10 mg/kg; Wako, Osaka, Japan) was injected subcutaneously 6 hr before the first injection of HEBP or normal saline solution. Following the procedure described above, the mandibles were fixed in 70% ethanol for 7 days. A cross section 
2 mm thick at the second molar was made with a diamond disk and stained by being placed in Villanueva bone stain solution (Maruto; Tokyo, Japan) for 10 days. The specimens were then dehydrated with ethanol and embedded in Technovit 7200 VLC (Heraeus Kulzer; Wehrheim, Germany). The block was ground at the second molar, then the calcein labeling was observed by mounting the ground surface of the block on the stage of a fluorescence digital microscope (VB-6000; Keyence, Tokyo, Japan).
Contact Microradiogram
To examine the mineral density of the matrix in mandible, we prepared sections for contact microradiogram. The mandibles were fixed in 70% ethanol for 7 days. A cross section 2 mm thick at the second molar was made with a diamond disk and stained by being placed in Villanueva bone stain solution for 10 days. The specimens were then dehydrated with ethanol and embedded in Technovit 7200 VLC, and the blocks were ground to a thickness of 100 µm. Contact microradiographs were taken with a Sofron SRO-405C (Sofron; Tokyo, Japan), employing Kodak SO-181 high-resolution film (Eastman Kodak; Rochester, NY). Irradiation was done at 10 kV and 3.5 mA for 25 min.
Paraffin Immunohistochemistry
For immunohistochemical and histocytological observations, the fixed mandibles were decalcified with 10% EDTA for 10 days at 4C. Then the decalcified mandibles were cut into frontal sections 3 mm thick at the second molar. The specimens were dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in paraffin. Sections 6 µm thick were obtained and subjected to immunohistochemistry.
The sections were preincubated for 1 hr at room temperature in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Then the specimens were incubated for 3 hr at room temperature with goat anti-mouse SOST antibody (R and D Systems; Minneapolis, MN) diluted 1:100 in 0.01 M PBS; this was followed by incubation with the Simple Stain MAX-PO(G) (Histofine; Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized with a DAB substrate kit (Histofine) and observed under a light microscope.
Electron Microscopic Observation
Some mandibles fixed with glutaraldehyde were decalcified with 4.13% EDTA for 2 weeks at 4C. These specimens were then cut into frontal sections 1 mm thick at the second molar and postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in acetone, and embedded in Taab 812 epoxy resin (Okenshoji Co., Ltd; Tokyo, Japan).
Pre-embedding Immunocytochemistry
For immunohistochemical detection of SOST, 5-mm–thick blocks at the second molar were obtained from the decalcified mandible, and a frontal section 80 µm thick was obtained from each block with a Microslicer (D.S.K. DTK-1000; Kyoto, Japan). The sections were preincubated for 3 hr at 4C in 0.01 M PBS containing 1% BSA. The specimens were then incubated for 48 hr at 4C with goat anti-mouse SOST antibody diluted 1:100 in 0.01 M PBS. After incubation of the specimens with horseradish-peroxidase–conjugated rabbit anti-goat IgG F(ab')2 diluted 1:100 in 0.01 M PBS, the site of antigen–antibody reaction was visualized with a DAB substrate kit. Sections were postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide containing 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide and then dehydrated in graded acetone and embedded in Taab 812 epoxy resin.
Semi-thin and ultrathin sections from the resin blocks were obtained and respectively examined under a light or transmission electron microscope.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopSummaryIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
The area that we examined was the enamel-organ–covering bone (ECB) of the lower incisor. In the ECB of the control group, intense calcein labeling of the matrix was observed at a depth of two-thirds the distance from the periosteal surface (Figure 1A ). The labeling became diffuse toward the surface facing the enamel organ (EO). In the HEBP group, intense labeling was observed in the bone matrix in the middle of the ECB (Figure 1B). The thickness of the bone matrix from the most intense part of the calcein label to the periosteal surface, indicating the amount of bone matrix formed during the experimental period, was about the same in the control and HEBP groups. The bone matrix from the most intense part of the calcein label to the EO-facing surface was thicker in the HEBP group than in the control as a result of inhibition of bone resorption on the EO-facing surface by the HEBP.
|
In the control ECB, only a thin layer of the bone matrix close to the periosteal surface showed radiolucency (Figures 2A and 2C), whereas in the HEBP group, the entire periosteal half of the ECB—all of the bone matrix formed during the experiment—was radiolucent (Figures 2B and 2D).
|
Histologically, in the control ECB, plump osteocytes were observed only in the bone matrix near the periosteal surface of the ECB (Figure 3A ). These osteocytes had features similar to those of osteoblasts on the periosteal surface: they were rich in rER and had a well-developed Golgi complex in their plump cytoplasm (Figure 4A ). In the ECB of controls, most of the osteocytes, other than those seen near the periosteal surface, were thin and possessed fewer organelles (Figure 4C). In contrast, in the HEBP group, large, plump osteocytes were observed in the periosteal half of the ECB (Figure 3B). These osteocytes were similar to those seen near the periosteal surface in the control ECB (Figure 4B). In the HEBP group, the osteocytes in the calcified half of the ECB, which faced the EO, were thin and had features typical of mature osteocytes, with fewer organelles (Figure 4D).
|
|
Anti-SOST immunolabeling was observed in the osteocytes and lacunocanalicular system. In the control group, immunopositive osteocytes were found throughout the ECB, except near the periosteal surface (Figure 5A ). In the HEBP group, the osteocytes in the periosteal half of the ECB where the bone matrix was not calcified failed to show immunoreactivity (Figure 5B). Under the electron microscope, immunolabeling for anti-SOST was detected on the surface of the bone lacunae and canalicules and in the space between the lacunar surface and the plasma membrane of the thin, matured osteocytes in control animals (Figure 6 ).
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopSummaryIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
In the ECB of the rat, bone formation on the periosteal surface is coupled with bone resorption on the EO-facing surface, resulting in expansion of the bone toward the outside with controlled thickness (Irie and Ozawa 1990
). As a consequence, in the ECB, the young osteocytes reside near the periosteal surface and the mature ones in the inner bone matrix (Irie et al. 2000). Thus the ECB is a suitable site for observing osteocyte maturation.
The thickness of the bone matrix between the periosteal surface and the calcein labeling was about the same in the control and HEBP groups, suggesting that the amount of matrix formed was not affected by the administration of HEBP. However, the corresponding area was highly radiolucent in the HEBP group, whereas the area in the control group was radiopaque, indicating that the matrix formed during the experimental period was unmineralized in the HEBP group. These findings are consistent with the demonstration by Nakahara et al. (1986) that HEBP inhibits mineralization of the bone matrix but does not prevent formation of the bone matrix during ectopic bone formation.
Histologically, the osteocytes seen in this unmineralized bone matrix were large and plump. Ultrastructural observation confirmed that they had rich rER and a well-developed Golgi complex, resembling osteoblasts on the periosteal bone surface. These features are characteristic of young osteocytes, and in the control group, they were seen only in the bone matrix near the periosteal surface. In the HEBP group, even at mid-depth in the ECB where the matrix was not mineralized, the majority of osteocytes seen were of the immature type, with rich rER and a well-developed Golgi apparatus. Morris et al. (1990) also observed osteoblast-like cells surrounded by osteoid matrix in an HEBP-treated, osteosarcoma-derived ectopic bone formation model. These findings suggest that the osteocytes in unmineralized bone matrix stay immature. The fact that mature-type osteocytes were found in mineralized bone matrix in both the control and the HEBP groups suggests the critical role of matrix mineralization in osteocyte maturation.
It is noteworthy that the plump osteocytes in the unmineralized bone matrix in the HEBP group failed to show immunoreactivity to anti-SOST antibody. Van Bezooijen et al. (2005) reported that SOST mRNA expression was restricted to the mineralization phase of osteoblastic cultures. An immunohistochemical study by Poole et al. (2005) demonstrated that sclerostin-negative osteocytes were significantly closer to bone surfaces than were the more numerous sclerostin-positive osteocytes; they concluded that newly embedded osteocytes start secreting sclerostin after they mature in some way. These results, together with our findings that osteocytes in the mineralized bone matrix of both the control and the HEBP group showed immunoreactivity to anti-SOST antibody, suggest that sclerostin-secreting osteocytes are mature osteocytes. Moreover, we confirmed by electron microscopy that immunolabeling for sclerostin was detected only in mature osteocytes.
The mechanism by which an osteocyte senses the mineralization of the surrounding matrix is obscure. Recently, Hirao et al. (2007) reported that hypoxic conditions promoted the transformation from osteoblast to osteocyte. Thus, it is possible to suppose that a change in access to oxygen is a trigger for the cytodifferentiation of osteocytes. An osteocyte in the mineralized matrix is in a relatively hypoxic condition compared with an osteocyte in unmineralized matrix, even at the same distance from the bone surface. Shear stress produced by fluid flow through the lacuno-canalicular system in bone matrix has also been acknowledged to affect osteocyte function (Bonewald 2006a; Zhang et al. 2006). Assuming that fluid flow in mineralized matrix differs from that in unmineralized matrix, an altered set of genes might be activated in osteocytes. Moreover, the mechanics of the mineralized matrix itself must be significantly different from that of unmineralized matrix. Thus mechanosensing osteocytes (Bonewald 2006b) may sense the difference of the mechanics between mineralized and unmineralized matrix to start the transformation (Mikuni-Takagaki et al. 1996; Khatiwala et al. 2006; Peyton et al. 2007). Another appealing idea is the existence of an unknown mineralization-sensing mechanism in osteocytes, because osteocytes have long been acknowledged to play a role in calcium homeostasis. In this context, dentin matrix protein 1, which is reported to be involved in matrix mineralization and osteocyte differentiation (Feng et al. 2006), is an interesting candidate player in the mineralization-sensing mechanism of osteocytes. In any case, directly or indirectly, matrix mineralization induces osteocyte maturation.
In conclusion, we prevented the mineralization of newly formed bone matrix and examined the morphological and functional changes in the osteocytes. We found plump, immature osteocytes in the unmineralized bone matrix, even far from the bone surface. Only the mature-type osteocytes in the mineralized bone matrix showed immunoreactivity for the anti-SOST antibody. These findings strongly suggest that neither the time elapsed since burial in the bone matrix, nor the distance from the bone surface, but the mineralization of the matrix surrounding the osteocyte is the trigger of cytodifferentiation from young osteocyte to mature osteocyte. They also suggest that osteocytes start secreting sclerostin only after they mature in the mineralized bone matrix.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication December 9, 2007; accepted February 11, 2008
|
Literature Cited |
|---|
|
TopSummaryIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
Balemans W, Ebeling M, Patel N, Van Hul E, Olson P, Dioszegi M, Lacza C, et al. (2001) Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted protein (SOST). Hum Mol Genet 10:537–543
Bellido T (2006) Summary: Osteocyte control of bone formation via Sost/sclerostin. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 6:360–363
Bonewald L (2006a) Osteocytes as multifunctional cells. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 6:331–333[Medline]
Bonewald LF (2006b) Mechanosensation and transduction in osteocytes. Bonekey Osteovision 3:7–15[Medline]
Brunkow ME, Gardner JC, Van Ness J, Paeper BW, Kovacevich BR, Proll S, Skonier JE, et al. (2001) Bone dysplasia sclerosteosis results from loss of the SOST gene product, a novel cystine knot-containing protein. Am J Hum Genet 68:577–589[CrossRef][Medline]
Feng JQ, Ward LM, Liu S, Lu Y, Xie Y, Yuan B, Yu X, et al. (2006) Loss of DMP1 causes rickets and osteomalacia and identifies a role for osteocytes in mineral metabolism. Nat Genet 38:1310–1315[CrossRef][Medline]
Fleisch H (1981) Diphosphonates: history and mechanisms of action. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res 3:279–287[CrossRef][Medline]
Fleisch H, Russell RG (1972) A review of the physiological and pharmacological effects of pyrophosphate and diphosphonates on bones and teeth. J Dent Res 51:324–332[Medline]
Hirao M, Hashimoto J, Yamasaki N, Ando W, Tsuboi H, Myoui A, Yoshikawa H (2007) Oxygen tension is an important mediator of the transformation of osteoblasts to osteocytes. J Bone Miner Metab 25:266–276[CrossRef][Medline]
Irie K, Ozawa H (1990) Relationships between tooth eruption, occlusion and alveolar bone resorption: cytological and cytochemical studies of bone resorption on rat incisor alveolar bone facing the enamel. Arch Histol Cytol 53:497–509[Medline]
Irie K, Ozawa H, Yajima T (2000) The histochemical and cytochemical changes from formative to resorptive osteocytes. Acta Histochem Cytochem 33:385–391[CrossRef]
Jande SS, Belanger LF (1973) The life cycle of the osteocyte. Clin Orthop Relat Res 94:281–305[Medline]
Khatiwala CB, Peyton SR, Putnam AJ (2006) Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3–E1 cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290:C1640–1650
Mikuni-Takagaki Y, Suzuki Y, Kawase T, Saito S (1996) Distinct responses of different populations of bone cells to mechanical stress. Endocrinology 137:2028–2035[Abstract]
Morris DC, Anderson HC, Yoshikawa H, Nakahara H, Takaoka K, Ono K (1990) Matrix vesicle calcification of ectopically induced osteoid tissue in 1-hydroxethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (HEBP)-treated mice. Bone 11:281–286[Medline]
Nakahara H, Yoshikawa H, Takaoka K, Ono K (1986) Effect of ethane-1-hydroxy-1,1-diphosphonate on ectopic bone formation induced by murine osteosarcoma-derived bone-inducing substance. Bone 7:229–233[Medline]
Nijweide PJ, Burger EH, Klein-Nulend J (2002) The osteocyte. In Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA, eds. Principles of Bone Biology. London, Academic Press, 93–107
Peyton SR, Ghajar CM, Khatiwala CB, Putnam AJ (2007) The emergence of ECM mechanics and cytoskeletal tension as important regulators of cell function. Cell Biochem Biophys 47:300–320[CrossRef][Medline]
Poole KE, van Bezooijen RL, Loveridge N, Hamersma H, Papapoulos SE, Lowik CW, Reeve J (2005) Sclerostin is a delayed secreted product of osteocytes that inhibits bone formation. FASEB J 19:1842–1844
Schenk R, Merz WA, Muhlbauer R, Russell RG, Fleisch H (1973) Effect of ethane-1-hydroxy-1,1-diphosphonate (EHDP) and dichloromethylene diphosphonate (Cl 2 MDP) on the calcification and resorption of cartilage and bone in the tibial epiphysis and metaphysis of rats. Calcif Tissue Res 11:196–214[Medline]
van Bezooijen RL, Roelen BA, Visser A, van der Wee-Pals L, de Wilt E, Karperien M, Hamersma H, et al. (2004) Sclerostin is an osteocyte-expressed negative regulator of bone formation, but not a classical BMP antagonist. J Exp Med 199:805–814
van Bezooijen RL, Svensson JP, Eefting D, Visser A, van der Horst G, Karperien M, Quax PH, et al. (2007) Wnt but not BMP signaling is involved in the inhibitory action of sclerostin on BMP-stimulated bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 22:19–28[CrossRef][Medline]
van Bezooijen RL, ten Dijke P, Papapoulos SE, Lowik CW (2005) SOST/sclerostin, an osteocyte-derived negative regulator of bone formation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 16:319–327[CrossRef][Medline]
Winkler DG, Sutherland MK, Geoghegan JC, Yu C, Hayes T, Skonier JE, Shpektor D, et al. (2003) Osteocyte control of bone formation via sclerostin, a novel BMP antagonist. EMBO J 22:6267–6276[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang K, Barragan-Adjemian C, Ye L, Kotha S, Dallas M, Lu Y, Zhao S, et al. (2006) E11/gp38 selective expression in osteocytes: regulation by mechanical strain and role in dendrite elongation. Mol Cell Biol 26:4539–4552
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Kneissel The Promise of Sclerostin Inhibition for the Treatment of Osteoporosis IBMS BoneKEy, July 1, 2009; 6(7): 259 - 264. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R.L. van Bezooijen, A.L. Bronckers, R.A. Gortzak, P.C.W. Hogendoorn, L. van der Wee-Pals, W. Balemans, H.J. Oostenbroek, W. Van Hul, H. Hamersma, F.G. Dikkers, et al. Sclerostin in Mineralized Matrices and van Buchem Disease Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 2009; 88(6): 569 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact |